If someone developed a world view which was internally and externally consistent, logically necessary in every respect, used common English for most purposes, could be explained at any level of detail, was perfectly compatible with the best understandings of science, and which answers the vast majority of questions in ontology, epistemology, and metaphysics, would you say that had "solved" the latter?
internally and externally consistent
Five components maps both physically (ie. legs/arms/head) and metaphysically (ie. knowledge/ignorance/will).
logically necessary in every respect
Aside from the need to reject Aristotelian logic:
A =/= A (incomplete)
A = *A
*variability: permits bi-directional (viz. in/out) (e)motion(s) (+/-)
*A = +A and/or -A
This allows the centrifugal/centripetal (expanding/contracting) motion(s) needed
as *A is assumed to be any theoretical being
with an active will
used common English for most purposes
By establishing two poles viz.
all-knowing and all-belief-based-ignorance (√-A and √+A)
along with the two primordial/universal modalities of (+)all
(alpha) and (-)not
a logical tautology emerges - (will) TO KNOW ALL THUS: NOT TO BELIEVE (certainly tends towards all-knowing)
whereas TO BELIEVE ALL THUS: NOT TO KNOW tends towards any/all-belief-based ignorance(s) causing suffering/death.
could be explained at any level of detail
The geometry seen here:
is the same vesica piscis form Genesis 1:1 describes:
ii. eth ha'shema'yim = (essence of) heavens (above, one circle)
i. B'resh'yith bara eloh'yim = ∞ (bestowal/reception ad infinitum)
iii. v'eth ha'aretz = (essence of) earth (below, other circle)
thus satisfies any/all possible Biblical context(s) modeled by Genesis.
was perfectly compatible with the best understandings of science
Discarding the book of Genesis as not real science,
satisfies basic centrifugal/centripetal (-A/+A) forces viz. magnetic and dielectric field modalities (ie. electromagnetism)
and describes the real geometry of a basic torus field (ie. same structure as the universe).
and which answers the vast majority of questions in ontology, epistemology, and metaphysics,
This view undermines the "believer vs. unbeliever" conflict entirely (as designed) such to cease suffering/death, and satisfies any practical non-belief-based 'Christ':
(*A) I am
(+A/-A) the Alpha and the Omega
(√-A/√+A) the Beginning and the End
The two root(s) reduce/resolve into the two Edenic trees of Living (√-A) and of Knowledge of Good and Evil (√+A).
The problem can thus easily be framed with a simple dot-in-circle example:
dot = root of ignorance √+A
circle = root of knowledge √-A
wherein *A is any circle between these, its modalities +A and -A indicating towards/away
which can approach the circle from any of 360 degrees (ie. "eat from any tree except one").