Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:38 am
Over 200,000 COVID deaths in the US in less than 1 year. Compare that to the flu which kills anywhere from 3,000 to 49,000 per year. I'd say it's a serious pandemic alright. Looks like the skeptics here were wrong.
yep, that's the official count: 200,000
how many died from beer virus?
how many died with beer virus?
how many died, were counted as beer virus deaths, without any confirmation of actually bein' infected with beer virus?
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:38 am
Over 200,000 COVID deaths in the US in less than 1 year. Compare that to the flu which kills anywhere from 3,000 to 49,000 per year. I'd say it's a serious pandemic alright. Looks like the skeptics here were wrong.
yep, that's the official count: 200,000
how many died from beer virus?
how many died with beer virus?
how many died, were counted as beer virus deaths, without any confirmation of actually bein' infected with beer virus?
200,000 is a made up number
Even if that number were inflated by 50% that would still add up to twice as many deaths than flu. Just admit it Henry. You are wrong.
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:38 am
Over 200,000 COVID deaths in the US in less than 1 year. Compare that to the flu which kills anywhere from 3,000 to 49,000 per year. I'd say it's a serious pandemic alright. Looks like the skeptics here were wrong.
yep, that's the official count: 200,000
how many died from beer virus?
how many died with beer virus?
how many died, were counted as beer virus deaths, without any confirmation of actually bein' infected with beer virus?
200,000 is a made up number
Even if that number were inflated by 50% that would still add up to twice as many deaths than flu. Just admit it Henry. You are wrong.
what if only 10,000 folks actually died of beer virus: would I still be wrong?
what if nearly half of all 'murican beer virus deaths occurred in 4 states and were the result of governors warehousin' infected in elderly care facilities: would I still be wrong?
you, along with a whole whack of folks, have been spoonfed makarky
beer virus is nasty, but it ain't the coronapocalypse
Last edited by henry quirk on Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
how many died, were counted as beer virus deaths, without any confirmation of actually bein' infected with beer virus?
200,000 is a made up number
Even if that number were inflated by 50% that would still add up to twice as many deaths than flu. Just admit it Henry. You are wrong.
what if only 10,000 folks actually died of beer virus: would I still be wrong?
If it were that low, then you might be right. But that's a pretty big difference from 200,000. If It's that inflated, I seriously doubt it would be inflated that much.
Even if that number were inflated by 50% that would still add up to twice as many deaths than flu. Just admit it Henry. You are wrong.
what if only 10,000 folks actually died of beer virus: would I still be wrong?
If it were that low, then you might be right. But that's a pretty big difference from 200,000. If It's that inflated, I seriously doubt it would be inflated that much.
what if only 10,000 folks actually died of beer virus: would I still be wrong?
If it were that low, then you might be right. But that's a pretty big difference from 200,000. If It's that inflated, I seriously doubt it would be inflated that much.
why?
Maybe a better question would be why would you think things would be that overstated, 10,000 vs. 200,000 is an enormous discrepancy.
If it were that low, then you might be right. But that's a pretty big difference from 200,000. If It's that inflated, I seriously doubt it would be inflated that much.
why?
Maybe a better question would be why would you think things would be that overstated, 10,000 vs. 200,000 is an enormous discrepancy.
cuz commies lie, cheat, steal, kill
slavers gotta slave
it's an ugly business, subverting freedom without wreckin' social structure; a nasty, novel cold offered an unexpected means to that end
