the ToE of physics

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Advocate
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

the ToE of physics

Post by Advocate »

)Δ^∞(
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 9561
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by Harbal »

Advocate wrote: Sat Jul 30, 2022 4:37 pm)Δ^∞(
Have you been drinking?
Advocate
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by Advocate »

[quote=Harbal post_id=586967 time=1659197136 user_id=9107]
[quote=Advocate post_id=586958 time=1659195420 user_id=15238])Δ^∞([/quote]

Have you been drinking?
[/quote]

Smoking. What does that have to do with anything? Shut up and calculate.
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by alan1000 »

Is there a connection with b4i√U(RU/16)?
Advocate
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by Advocate »

[quote=alan1000 post_id=588011 time=1659618730 user_id=8247]
Is there a connection with b4i√U(RU/16)?
[/quote]

dunno
Impenitent
Posts: 4330
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by Impenitent »

life's a beach until you realize that the toes of physics hold the flip flops of chemistry against the feet of humanity...

-Imp
Age
Posts: 20194
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by Age »

If 'ToE' refers to a Theory of Everything, then how exactly could there be 'the Theory of Everything of physics?
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by alan1000 »

"Flip flops"? You must be a Pom. "b4i√U(RU/16)" is, of course, Australian mathematics.
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by alan1000 »

Age wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:49 am If 'ToE' refers to a Theory of Everything, then how exactly could there be 'the Theory of Everything of physics?
Age, surely you are being overly pedantic? Is not the ToE the central question in physics today?
bobmax
Posts: 596
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2022 7:38 am

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by bobmax »

alan1000 wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:28 pm Is not the ToE the central question in physics today?
But this is a "central" question that can only be asked by those who have not understood what science is.

There can be no ToE of physics.

Because physics is necessarily based on what does not belong to it.
Age
Posts: 20194
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: the ToE of physics

Post by Age »

alan1000 wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:28 pm
Age wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:49 am If 'ToE' refers to a Theory of Everything, then how exactly could there be 'the Theory of Everything of physics?
Age, surely you are being overly pedantic?
If one wants to speak about a Theory of Everything, then being careful, and even painstakingly, in one's analyses I suggest would be a necessary part.

A so-called Theory of Everything of physics, from my perspective, is NOT being careful AT ALL, and if you want to call me picking up on this MISTAKE being 'overly pedantic', then so be it.

Being 'pedantic' would, obviously, all depend on YOUR DEFINITION for that word, and being 'overly pedantic' is, obviously, VERY RELATIVE.

And, without ALL of the necessary information being provided, FIRST, a carefully constructed Correct answer to your CLOSED, LEADING and/or RHETORICAL question can NOT be supplied, to you.
alan1000 wrote: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:28 pm Is not the ToE the central question in physics today?
A Theory Of Everything could be considered one of the central things being sought out within the topic of 'physics', in the days when this is being written. Along with a Grand Unified Theory is. But, what is relatively, to you, back in those days, 'soon' to be DISCOVERED and UNCOVERED is that a Grand Unified Theory Of Everything actually turns out to be what Is and ALWAYS WAS, ACTUALLY and IRREFUTABLY True, Right, AND Correct.

Oh, and by the way, the ToE is NOT ANY question in physics at ANY time. let alone a central 'question', 'today'. The ToE is just a 'theory' and NOT a 'question', and if 'you' want to call that being 'pedantic' or even 'overly pedantic'. But it IS what IS ACTUALLY True, Right, AND Correct, which is a LOT more than can be said about what you have said and claimed here.

I asked 'you' an OPEN QUESTION, for 'you' to CLARIFY, of which 'we' are STILL WAITING FOR. So, "alan1000", surely 'you' are being overly DECEPTIVE and DEFLECTIVE here, correct?
Post Reply