PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 1:59 am
It is obvious that I did do that. Do you comprehend the C programming language?
It turns out that P never reaches the contradiction it is stuck in infinite recursion.
You fucking idiot.
Neither P nor N are supposed to reach a contradiction - you the idiot-human observing P and N are supposed to reach a contradiction.
When H says "P will halt" P does the OPPOSITE and gets stuck in infinite recursion.
When H says "P will get stuck in infinite recursion" P does the OPPOSITE and halts.
H is defined as ALWAYS being right.
H is ALWAYS wrong about P. Obviously! Because P ALWAYS does the OPPOSITE of what H says.
I am not reading your paper. Your inability to understand the notion of a pathological P specifically crafted to do the exact opposite of what H predicts is absolutely flabbergasting.
Even a child can intuit the basic urge of contrarian P just fucking with N.
If the halting problem had a universal solution then free will cannot exist. Because P will never be able to choose to do the opposite of what N predicted. If the halting provlem was solvable P will always do whatever N predicted.