When all the world is telling you that you are wrong it is time to reflect upon the possibility that you are indeed wrong
Degres are not lengths.
When all the world is telling you that you are wrong it is time to reflect upon the possibility that you are indeed wrong
But WTF said "Correct. That's why radians are defined as a length on the unit circle. Degrees are the same. Given the radius, a degree or a radian always denotes a particular length around the circumference."Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 11:34 amWhen all the world is telling you that you are wrong it is time to reflect upon the possibility that you are indeed wrong
Degres are not lengths.
A degree is an orientation.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 4:31 pmBut WTF said "Correct. That's why radians are defined as a length on the unit circle. Degrees are the same. Given the radius, a degree or a radian always denotes a particular length around the circumference."
I've no need to prove you wrong when you said nothing that makes any sense; when all you do is abuse the English language.
Thus the world is not saying I am wrong.
You still can't explain why I am wrong half the time anyhow,
Your entire career in PN is all about you misunderstanding the most basic language...thus making your stance as a pure unjustified assertion.....personally I just think you are grouchy and hate anyone and anything which does not think like you.
All directions have lengths give the two lines which result in an angle always have a distance between them.Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 9:33 pmA degree is an orientation.
A radius is a length and so too is a circumperence.I've no need to prove you wrong when you said nothing that makes any sense; when all you do is abuse the English language.
Thus the world is not saying I am wrong.
You still can't explain why I am wrong half the time anyhow,Your entire career in PN is all about you misunderstanding the most basic language...thus making your stance as a pure unjustified assertion.....personally I just think you are grouchy and hate anyone and anything which does not think like you.
You have nothing interesting to say. You do not have any way of thinking. You simply do not think; you just play with your misunderstood vocabulary.
It's a poor schtick. You might think it makes you look clever or interesting but you just look stupid.
No a vector is a vector, a length is a length and a degree is a degree. These words are designed to avoid in comprehensible foolishness.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 11:52 pmAll directions have lengths give the two lines which result in an angle always have a distance between them.Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 9:33 pmA degree is an orientation.
A radius is a length and so too is a circumperence.I've no need to prove you wrong when you said nothing that makes any sense; when all you do is abuse the English language.
Thus the world is not saying I am wrong.
You still can't explain why I am wrong half the time anyhow,Your entire career in PN is all about you misunderstanding the most basic language...thus making your stance as a pure unjustified assertion.....personally I just think you are grouchy and hate anyone and anything which does not think like you.
You have nothing interesting to say. You do not have any way of thinking. You simply do not think; you just play with your misunderstood vocabulary.
It's a poor schtick. You might think it makes you look clever or interesting but you just look stupid.
DUH
Philosophy is definition application...the definition of the word changes in context to the words it relates too.
Maybe. I'll fuck off then and leave you in your stew of mental problems.
If I was so stupid then continually responding to stupidity makes you look equally stupid. What you call stupidity others view as out of the box thinking.
1. And one cannot be define except through the other.Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:11 amNo a vector is a vector, a length is a length and a degree is a degree. These words are designed to avoid in comprehensible foolishness.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 11:52 pmAll directions have lengths give the two lines which result in an angle always have a distance between them.Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 9:33 pm
A degree is an orientation.
A radius is a length and so too is a circumperence.
I've no need to prove you wrong when you said nothing that makes any sense; when all you do is abuse the English language.
Your entire career in PN is all about you misunderstanding the most basic language.
You have nothing interesting to say. You do not have any way of thinking. You simply do not think; you just play with your misunderstood vocabulary.
It's a poor schtick. You might think it makes you look clever or interesting but you just look stupid.DUH
Philosophy is definition application...the definition of the word changes in context to the words it relates too.Maybe. I'll fuck off then and leave you in your stew of mental problems.
If I was so stupid then continually responding to stupidity makes you look equally stupid. What you call stupidity others view as out of the box thinking.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:26 am1. And one cannot be define except through the other.Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:11 amNo a vector is a vector, a length is a length and a degree is a degree. These words are designed to avoid in comprehensible foolishness.DUH
Philosophy is definition application...the definition of the word changes in context to the words it relates too.Maybe. I'll fuck off then and leave you in your stew of mental problems.
If I was so stupid then continually responding to stupidity makes you look equally stupid. What you call stupidity others view as out of the box thinking.
2. Thus the nature of degree changes when other words are applied to it.
3. If you could of you would of.
If you could HAVE you would HAVE.
No...could of, would of.Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 8:50 am
Oh look still confused!
Language is about understanding a position. Even if grammatical errors occur this does not negate the fact the position is understood. As a matter of fact if the errors can be spotted then it means what was meant to be said is understood.
I thin k you are on your own buddyEodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 6:28 pmLanguage is about understanding a position. Even if grammatical errors occur this does not negate the fact the position is understood. As a matter of fact if the errors can be spotted then it means what was meant to be said is understood.
This follows the same nature of a fallacy in argument where even if a fallacious argument is presented it does not necessarily mean the argument is wrong.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy
You still ignored the first two points.
"Think" not "thin k"........Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:15 pmI thin k you are on your own buddyEodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 6:28 pmLanguage is about understanding a position. Even if grammatical errors occur this does not negate the fact the position is understood. As a matter of fact if the errors can be spotted then it means what was meant to be said is understood.
This follows the same nature of a fallacy in argument where even if a fallacious argument is presented it does not necessarily mean the argument is wrong.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy
You still ignored the first two points.