Which is no different than what I said. What "ought to be" is simply a way of talking about individuals' preferences, which easily differ from individual to individual.Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:54 pmObviously, but in every instance of a "problem" the individual perceives a displeasing discrepancy between what is and what ought to be.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:36 pm What makes anything a problem or not is what an individual cares about, what they're interested in, what their preferences are, etc. Different people like/dislike different things.
First off, as you completely ignore the part about teaching.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:36 pm This analogy seems to indicate deep confusion on your part . . .
And yes, it often is assessed completely by peers (unfortunately, because it's often enough not very popular.)