P = -P

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: P = -P

Post by Terrapin Station »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 1:22 am
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon May 10, 2021 7:31 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon May 10, 2021 6:34 pm
So identity is subject to interpretation then?
I see you lost the ability to follow the conversation again.
False you said: "lol--this solely hinges on what people have in mind when they say something."

So I asked you: "So identity is subject to interpretation then?"
And "this" was a pronoun for?
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: P = -P

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Terrapin Station wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 9:20 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 1:22 am
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon May 10, 2021 7:31 pm

I see you lost the ability to follow the conversation again.
False you said: "lol--this solely hinges on what people have in mind when they say something."

So I asked you: "So identity is subject to interpretation then?"
And "this" was a pronoun for?
If I understand this refers to: "False, you are failing to look deeper into the language. Something "and" something is addition."

So again, is identity subject to interpretation then?
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: P = -P

Post by Terrapin Station »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 8:43 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 9:20 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 1:22 am
False you said: "lol--this solely hinges on what people have in mind when they say something."

So I asked you: "So identity is subject to interpretation then?"
And "this" was a pronoun for?
If I understand this refers to: "False, you are failing to look deeper into the language. Something "and" something is addition."

So again, is identity subject to interpretation then?
What in the world? You think that "this" was a pronoun standing for an entire sentence that you wrote AFTER I wrote "this"?
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: P = -P

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Terrapin Station wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 9:22 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 8:43 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Tue May 11, 2021 9:20 am
And "this" was a pronoun for?
If I understand this refers to: "False, you are failing to look deeper into the language. Something "and" something is addition."

So again, is identity subject to interpretation then?
What in the world? You think that "this" was a pronoun standing for an entire sentence that you wrote AFTER I wrote "this"?
"False, you are failing to look deeper into the language. Something "and" something is addition."

"This", as in your reference to what ever it was you where referencing when stating "lol--this solely hinges on what people have in mind when they say something" , occured after the above statement I made........

You are ignoring the question of whether or not identity is subject to interpretation.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: P = -P

Post by Terrapin Station »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 12, 2021 12:38 am
what ever it was you where referencing
Yeah, who knows what it might have been. Yet you're not conceding an inability follow the conversation.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: P = -P

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Terrapin Station wrote: Wed May 12, 2021 5:42 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 12, 2021 12:38 am
what ever it was you where referencing
Yeah, who knows what it might have been. Yet you're not conceding an inability follow the conversation.
You are ignoring the question and the question is relevant to the discussion: is identity subject to interpretation?
Post Reply