(0=0)=(1=1)

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

(0=0)=(1=1)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

(0=0)=(1=1)

0=1

Zero equals one through the law of identity where all numbers equivocate as contexts.
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by alan1000 »

So when you withdraw money from an ATM, it doesn't matter which numbers you enter?
Skepdick
Posts: 14366
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by Skepdick »

alan1000 wrote: Sat Feb 05, 2022 11:57 am So when you withdraw money from an ATM, it doesn't matter which numbers you enter?
When you are about to withdraw money from an ATM is't pertinent to know which number-system they are using.

Least you get confused over trivialities such as zero-based indexing.

Can I have two eggs please? Sure.

0 -> 🥚
1 -> 🥚
2 -> 🥚
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by alan1000 »

I think you will find that most ATMs presuppose the usual decimal numbering system.
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by alan1000 »

Can you explain "zero-based indexing"? I'm not sure what that means in this context.
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by alan1000 »

Eggs conform to a binary numbering system - yolks and whites - and so are not relevant to this mathematical context.
Impenitent
Posts: 4332
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by Impenitent »

binary? nope... whites, yolks, shells

-Imp
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by alan1000 »

I stand corrected. With reservations as to whether the numerous membranes within the egg should be counted also... :lol:
Skepdick
Posts: 14366
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by Skepdick »

alan1000 wrote: Tue Feb 08, 2022 12:23 pm I stand corrected. With reservations as to whether the numerous membranes within the egg should be counted also... :lol:
And you still left out the double-yolks...
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by alan1000 »

You're yolking, right?
hegkoo4
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2022 8:45 pm

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by hegkoo4 »

In this context, this is certainly true, but in any other it will not be equal
CHNOPS
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:11 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by CHNOPS »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2020 10:33 pm (0=0)=(1=1)

0=1

Zero equals one through the law of identity where all numbers equivocate as contexts.
(0 == 0) == (1 == 1)

that means that the first has the same validity than the second. Its not about the number, its about the validity.

(cat on the table) == (dog on the chair)

If the cat is on the table so then the dog is on the chair.

But the cat is not the same as the dog, and the table is not the same as the chair.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

hegkoo4 wrote: Tue Apr 12, 2022 8:59 pm In this context, this is certainly true, but in any other it will not be equal
Yet it is true in one context thus exists as truth, it only takes one context.
Magnus Anderson
Posts: 330
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:26 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by Magnus Anderson »

What does (0=0)=(1=1) mean?

I suppose that it means "The truth value of 0=0 is equal to the truth value of 1=1".

If so, the truth value of "0=0" isn't "0" but "true"; and the truth value of "1=1" isn't "1" but "true".

Thus, true=true rather than 0=1.
godelian
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed May 04, 2022 4:21 am

Re: (0=0)=(1=1)

Post by godelian »

A less ambiguous way of looking at the expression, is:

(0=0) ⇔(1=1)

For truth values, it may be preferable to use the "⇔" symbol instead of the "=" symbol.

The expression evaluates to:

true ⇔true

Which in turn evaluates to:

true

Still, I think that it is not wrong to use the equality symbol instead of the equivalence symbol for truth values.
Post Reply