The descriptive value of a logical statement is a recursion of the general syntax which forms the rules of the assertion.
In a statement such as A --> B the rules of the syntax necessitates a specific format through which the words can be ordered. This order, that which allows for a clarity of words, is by nature subject to its own syntax as a descriptive statement. Where the syntax laws may exist as A --> B, the rules which define the following statement of X --> Y are a recursion of the syntax into a new form.
Considering the syntax must follow its own syntax, if the syntax is to be properly defined, any expression of the syntax, through the manifestation of a proposition following in accords with the syntax, are a replication of the syntax itself. This necessitates that while an assertion must follow a syntax, this syntax by default is an assertion considering both the syntax and assertion are inseperable.
The syntax rule of A --> B replicates itself under the assertion X --> Y and as such forms a tautological statement of (A-->B) --> (X-->Y) where any syntax, expressing itself through an assertion is by default an assertion itself.
Assertions are Replications of Syntax, thus necessitating Syntax as an Assertion
Assertions are Replications of Syntax, thus necessitating Syntax as an Assertion
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Assertions are Replications of Syntax, thus necessitating Syntax as an Assertion
I'm glad we found something to agree on! And thanks for the gracious response.
Re: Assertions are Replications of Syntax, thus necessitating Syntax as an Assertion
You are not the first to make the comment, the its/it's dualism has alway been a bad habit of mine.