Assumptive Logic
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2019 3:22 am
This argument will be completely absurd and most will not understand how absurd it really is...
So save the insults and adhominums...this argument is about losing sanity...not gaining it.
If we are to look at the nature of any logical or mathematical system, it is grounded in assumed axioms. Assumption is the grounding of logic and math, but thus necessitates a paradox where this is a foundation.
Thus the only logical foundation we can assume without contradiction is assumption as a form where the argument can only be defined as assumable if it has a given form.
Considering there are infinite forms in which an argument may exist, to map this leads to a contradiction, but this contradiction is necessary as axioms are necessary. It is thus logical, by form alone, that logic formalizations will diverge from this assumed form thereby necessitating contradiction as rational through an isomorphic dualism.
All foundations are an assumed point of observation, this is the foundation.
Coherency is assumed.
Infinity is assumed.
All coherency is circular, this is coherent.
Foundations are circular.
Infinity is circular.
All infinitism is linear, this is infinite.
Foundations are infinite.
Coherency is infinite.
Certain things can be shown but not said, but in showing them we put boundaries on them and effectively cause a contradiction to occur. I can say "dog" but this does not necessarily exist as a full truth as to what "dog" is or is not.
The same applies to any formal system of logic, it is contradictory by it's own nature of description but the formal system still exists. Thus all logical systems are by default paradoxical and are simultaneously true and false.
The mapping of any formal system, through symbols, is grounded in the base symbols which underlie all assumed axioms of logic and logic by default.
Assumption = •
Continuum of assumptions = --->
Cycling of assumptions = ⊙
Assumption as Context= ( )
Modifications and updates: *****
Each point exists in a pair, thus the number are only for demarcation and are not limited to a linear format:
1 and 11
2 and 10
3 and 9
4 and 8
5 and 7
6 progresses to all points respectively in the same manner 1 progresses to 11 and 11 progresses to 1, it pairs off with its respective polarities:
1 and 6 and 6 and 11.
2 and 5 and 7 and 10.
3 and 4 and 8 and 9.
This again pairs off where any demarcated point can lead to another in any variation of order and still lead back to the original beginning point.
1. •
2. • ---> • ***** (1. ---> 2.). •<: (1. <--- 2.). :>•
3. •⊙• ***** (3a. <--- (1.⊙ 2.)). □
4. (•)•
5. (• ---> •)• ---> (•⊙•)•
6. (• ---> •)• ⊙ (•⊙•)•
7. ((•)•)•
8. (--->)•
9. ((--->)• ---> (--->)•)•
10. (⊙)•
11. ((⊙)• ⊙ (⊙)•)•
12. •
1. This is an assumption.
2. This assumption progresses to another assumption.
3. The progression of the original assumption, as a new assumption, is the assumption cycling itself.
4. This is an assumption of assumption.
5. This progression of one assumption to another is an assumption, this progresses to the assumption that all assumptions cycle.
6. The progression of one assumption to another is an assumption, this cycles to the assumption that all assumptions cycle.
7. This is progressive assumption.
8. Multiple assumptions are progressive, this progress is assumed.
9. Multiple assumptions as progressive progress to multiple assumptions that are progressive.
10. This assumption of multiple progression is circular and is assumed.
11. The assumption of circularity circulates with the assumption of circularity as an assumption.
12. This argument is assumed and defined as self referential but open to expansion. It is both complete and incomplete as assumed.
These assumptions necessitate inherent laws that are inevitable within the nature of assumption.
1. Assumptive Law of Recursive Middle:
All assumptions exist as variations of eachother through a recursive state, thus all assumptions exist as a center point within the continuum of assumptions.
2. Assumptive Law of Isomorphic Void:
All assumptions are void in themselves unless they continue to further axioms, thus each axiom as void voids itself into another axiom. And axiom as void negates to an axiom as existing, one axiom inverts to many.
3. Assumptive Law of Form and Function.
Axioms as inherent middles necessitate a symmetry where each axiom as a center point observes each axiom as circular through recursion. Axioms as inherently void necessitates all axioms as functions where a function, as that which changes one form to another, is fundamentally formless.
All assumptions are both form and function.
So save the insults and adhominums...this argument is about losing sanity...not gaining it.
If we are to look at the nature of any logical or mathematical system, it is grounded in assumed axioms. Assumption is the grounding of logic and math, but thus necessitates a paradox where this is a foundation.
Thus the only logical foundation we can assume without contradiction is assumption as a form where the argument can only be defined as assumable if it has a given form.
Considering there are infinite forms in which an argument may exist, to map this leads to a contradiction, but this contradiction is necessary as axioms are necessary. It is thus logical, by form alone, that logic formalizations will diverge from this assumed form thereby necessitating contradiction as rational through an isomorphic dualism.
All foundations are an assumed point of observation, this is the foundation.
Coherency is assumed.
Infinity is assumed.
All coherency is circular, this is coherent.
Foundations are circular.
Infinity is circular.
All infinitism is linear, this is infinite.
Foundations are infinite.
Coherency is infinite.
Certain things can be shown but not said, but in showing them we put boundaries on them and effectively cause a contradiction to occur. I can say "dog" but this does not necessarily exist as a full truth as to what "dog" is or is not.
The same applies to any formal system of logic, it is contradictory by it's own nature of description but the formal system still exists. Thus all logical systems are by default paradoxical and are simultaneously true and false.
The mapping of any formal system, through symbols, is grounded in the base symbols which underlie all assumed axioms of logic and logic by default.
Assumption = •
Continuum of assumptions = --->
Cycling of assumptions = ⊙
Assumption as Context= ( )
Modifications and updates: *****
Each point exists in a pair, thus the number are only for demarcation and are not limited to a linear format:
1 and 11
2 and 10
3 and 9
4 and 8
5 and 7
6 progresses to all points respectively in the same manner 1 progresses to 11 and 11 progresses to 1, it pairs off with its respective polarities:
1 and 6 and 6 and 11.
2 and 5 and 7 and 10.
3 and 4 and 8 and 9.
This again pairs off where any demarcated point can lead to another in any variation of order and still lead back to the original beginning point.
1. •
2. • ---> • ***** (1. ---> 2.). •<: (1. <--- 2.). :>•
3. •⊙• ***** (3a. <--- (1.⊙ 2.)). □
4. (•)•
5. (• ---> •)• ---> (•⊙•)•
6. (• ---> •)• ⊙ (•⊙•)•
7. ((•)•)•
8. (--->)•
9. ((--->)• ---> (--->)•)•
10. (⊙)•
11. ((⊙)• ⊙ (⊙)•)•
12. •
1. This is an assumption.
2. This assumption progresses to another assumption.
3. The progression of the original assumption, as a new assumption, is the assumption cycling itself.
4. This is an assumption of assumption.
5. This progression of one assumption to another is an assumption, this progresses to the assumption that all assumptions cycle.
6. The progression of one assumption to another is an assumption, this cycles to the assumption that all assumptions cycle.
7. This is progressive assumption.
8. Multiple assumptions are progressive, this progress is assumed.
9. Multiple assumptions as progressive progress to multiple assumptions that are progressive.
10. This assumption of multiple progression is circular and is assumed.
11. The assumption of circularity circulates with the assumption of circularity as an assumption.
12. This argument is assumed and defined as self referential but open to expansion. It is both complete and incomplete as assumed.
These assumptions necessitate inherent laws that are inevitable within the nature of assumption.
1. Assumptive Law of Recursive Middle:
All assumptions exist as variations of eachother through a recursive state, thus all assumptions exist as a center point within the continuum of assumptions.
2. Assumptive Law of Isomorphic Void:
All assumptions are void in themselves unless they continue to further axioms, thus each axiom as void voids itself into another axiom. And axiom as void negates to an axiom as existing, one axiom inverts to many.
3. Assumptive Law of Form and Function.
Axioms as inherent middles necessitate a symmetry where each axiom as a center point observes each axiom as circular through recursion. Axioms as inherently void necessitates all axioms as functions where a function, as that which changes one form to another, is fundamentally formless.
All assumptions are both form and function.