Does at least one existence exist?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:09 pmFalse, it is correct.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 2:33 amI would estimate that you are using the term paradox incorrectly.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 2:03 am
Yes, basic counting. Anything can be quantified, thus we may observe how a phenomenon exists in time and space, but we never really know its qualities.
The reverse works for qualifying a phenomenon into categories. I may qualify a rose but it does not take into account all the other types of flowers. Or I may qualifies flowers, but it does not take into account other organisms. The same applies for organisms and minerals etc.
Thus we are left with a paradox in the act of measurement and if any unity or synthesis is to be observed we have to look at common denominators.
A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to an apparently-self-contradictory or logically unacceptable conclusion.
In quantifying a phenomenon, the quantifier can mean an infinite number of things. However the quantifer only exists if something can be counted. This requires a quality. Thus in becoming more precise in a quantity, we become less precise in a quality. In counting oranges we lose detail about the qualities of the orange.
The reverse occurs.
In becoming defined in one thing, you become undefined in another. Increasing analysis results in increasing obscurity.
Does justice ever exist? How many "justice" exist?