The arbitrary choice of the range/precision trade-off

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Logik
Posts: 4041
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:48 pm

The arbitrary choice of the range/precision trade-off

Post by Logik »

uwot wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:29 pm
Logik wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:23 pm
Scott Mayers wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:22 pm logik, we don't need to stay on Willy's thread for this. Let's give his thread a break. It's drifting way off topic.
Cool. Start a thread in which you explain why 9.81 is approximately 9.8, but it is NOT approximately 10 :)
Yes please.
The value of g on Earth is 9.80665 m/s^2

Which can be rounded up as follows:

In base 10 with precision of 2 decimal places g ≈ 9.81 (≈ for approximately)
In base 10 with precision of 1 decimal place g ≈ 9.8
In base 10 with precision of 0 decimal places g ≈ 10
In base 11 with precision of 0 decimal places g ≈ 11
In base 12 with precision of 0 decimal places g ≈ 12
....
In base 19 with precision of 0 decimal places g ≈ 19
In base 20 with precision of 0 decimal places g ≈ 0

This is how deconstruction works in practice. By simply making arbitrary choices about my numeric system and my precision I can render g to be a meaningless dichotomy. 1 or 0.

Now I am asking you the question:

WHY have you CHOOSEN to round 9.81 up to 9.8 and stopped there?
Why didn't you round it up to 10?
Or 11?
Or 12?
Or 18?

You could have, but you didn't.

WHY?
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: The arbitrary choice of the range/precision trade-off

Post by Dontaskme »

Logik wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:38 pm
You could have, but you didn't.

WHY?
Why not?
Logik
Posts: 4041
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:48 pm

Re: The arbitrary choice of the range/precision trade-off

Post by Logik »

Dontaskme wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:37 pm
Logik wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:38 pm
You could have, but you didn't.

WHY?
Why not?
First obscurantist.
noun
noun: obscurantist; plural noun: obscurantists

1.
a person who deliberately prevents the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: The arbitrary choice of the range/precision trade-off

Post by Dontaskme »

Logik wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:45 pm
Dontaskme wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 1:37 pm
Logik wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:38 pm
You could have, but you didn't.

WHY?
Why not?
First obscurantist.
noun
noun: obscurantist; plural noun: obscurantists

1.
a person who deliberately prevents the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
No results found for obscurantist.
Logik
Posts: 4041
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:48 pm

Re: The arbitrary choice of the range/precision trade-off

Post by Logik »

Dontaskme wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:12 pm No results found for obscurantist.
Search in mirror.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: The arbitrary choice of the range/precision trade-off

Post by Dontaskme »

Logik wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:13 pm
Dontaskme wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:12 pm No results found for obscurantist.
Search in mirror.
There is nothing in a mirror, but a reflection of it's own emptiness.

Not-knowing knowing.

First person singular pronoun. (Metaphoric pointing, not literal.

.
Post Reply