The Purpose of Mathematics (Math as a message/model)

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
roydop
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:37 pm

The Purpose of Mathematics (Math as a message/model)

Post by roydop »

Core Axiom: Mathematics is a message.

1.Mathematics is information with a purpose.
2.Mathematics is not created by human consciousness; it was discovered.
3.Therefore, mathematics is a message (definition: communication sent or left for a recipient that cannot be contacted directly).
4.The point of a message is to direct attention to something forward in time (eg: a road sign).
5.A message will not reveal any additional information about the message itself. (eg: a road sign does not reveal any deeper message about the sign itself).

Therefore, the appearance of mathematics relating additional information about itself is an indication of an initial misinterpretation of the message.

Yes, I am saying that the conventional use of mathematics as a tool is a mis-allocation of the information (a misinterpretation of the message) left for us. Technology, having destroyed all life on earth (yes we are kaput) is in "error"/opposition with natural law. Human's utilization of mathematics is what made technology possible.

We got it wrong. We misinterpreted what 01 represents (the implication being that the 01 system should be adequate to explain everything, given the proper interpretation), and then we misinterpreted 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 10.... and then... . Of course if the initial answer/interpretation is incorrect but taken to be correct, each successive iteration will actually lead consciousness on a path away/further from the phenomena initially pointed to. If the initial message is consequently never revisited/investigated (and properly interpreted), but assumed correct, every single evolutionary step in the process will lead further from the conclusion/answer. A thought experiment into such an errant system reveals that it would quickly become a labyrinth of delusion (Do I really need to point out how fucked up humans are)? This is not as difficult to believe as one might initially think. Things like the Nazis happen...

So the current conventional path of science is an infinite wild goose chase. Now get this: The model itself is indicating this. The number system has a beginning, but no end. So if we look at the number system as a model capable of prediction, it would tell us that there is no conclusion "going forward"/"outward". The expansion of the physical universe has a beginning and no end. Applied to the biggest scale imaginable, see the cycle of samsara. 

If current human consciousness did not create math, but yet can "read"/understand it, it is "connected" within human consciousness and yet simultaneously disconnected in some manner. I believe that separation is time.

It would be beyond any reasonable probability for human consciousness to "find" a message from a higher dimensional, completely separate sentient species, and be able to "read" it. The manner in which mathematics has been discovered is much more like the act of remembering than the phenomena of discovering something never having encountered before.. 

If sentience from another dimension (let's say the future) wished to deliver a message to it's past self, it would have to be non-physical in nature. Mathematics exists in a parallel, non-physical realm (mind). What is symbol? Symbol is a bridge between the abstract realm of mind and the physical realm. A symbol exists in a quantum superposition of existing both in the realm of mind and matter. So if sentience from another dimension were to attempt to send a message into the physical realm, it would be in symbol form. However, again, a sign is not designed to reveal information about the sign, so any proliferation of symbol is in actuality an indication of a misinterpretation of the initial model/message. 

Assuming this to be true - that 01 and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, are models/messages sent to us from our future evolutionary level, what qualities would we expect such a system to possess?

I propose such a system would be:

1.Universal.
2.Uncomplicated.
3.Deeply rooted in human the psyche.
4.Necessarily non-physical in nature.
5.Expressing the same fundamental message as other systems of thought
6.Able to explain and predict fundamental phenomena.

1.Mathematics is universal.
2.Everyone over the age of two grasps the progressive nature of numbers.
3.Counting is one of the first things we teach our children.
4.Mathematics is abstract.
5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WY9Os4 ... =6&t=1816s

6.Predicts infinite redundancy if consciousness continues to seek experiences instead of going inward and remaining in Self.
Post Reply