The limitations of Aristotelian logic:LOGIC/ESSENCE AND LANGUAGE LEAD TO THE MEANINGLESSNESS OF ALL VIEWS

[Logik]

False, because all truth statements are self evident to the observer and as such form there perception in such a manner where it becomes knowledge...ie "knowing". Knowledge is inherently linked in with perspective, in this respect, and truth statements are not just an extension of it but intertwined.

Did we arrive at self-evident truth now ?

Tell physicists they are wasting YEARS of their lives learning all that nonsense - apparently QM is self-evident.
Tell EVERYBODY how you can read minds and you are the only human on this planet who has conquered informational asymmetry

The way you word things...I am beginning to believe you are lying about your private life as well.

The way you interpret my wording of things speaks more about your character than mine.
You sound rather paranoid. You've certainly accused me of lying more times than I care to count...

I am a sanctimonious moralist, remember?

I am the one who argues FOR objective morality, while you are playing your little relativist games.

[Eodnhoj7]

False, because all truth statements are self evident to the observer and as such form there perception in such a manner where it becomes knowledge...ie "knowing". Knowledge is inherently linked in with perspective, in this respect, and truth statements are not just an extension of it but intertwined.

Did we arrive at self-evident truth now ?

Tell physicists they are wasting YEARS of their lives learning all that nonsense - apparently QM is self-evident.
Tell EVERYBODY how you can read minds and you are the only human on this planet who has conquered informational asymmetry

You tell me:

Physicists study the universe (matter...which is a controversial term, energy, etc.).
We are composed of the universe.
Hence physics is the universe studying itself through a self referential loop.

All phenomenon are axioms, ie self evident truths.

The way you word things...I am beginning to believe you are lying about your private life as well.

The way you interpret my wording of things speaks more about your character than mine.
You sound rather paranoid. You've certainly accused me of lying more times than I care to count...

I am a sanctimonious moralist, remember?

I am the one who argues FOR objective morality, while you are playing your little relativist games.

False, there is not objective morality under your stance as this constitutes a truth statement and both truth and morality are separate according to you.

[Logik]

False, there is not objective morality under your stance as this constitutes a truth statement and both truth and morality are separate according to you.

I keep on having to remind you that you are not a mind reader. Because if you could read minds you wouldn't keep straw-manning my arguments.

[Eodnhoj7]

False, there is not objective morality under your stance as this constitutes a truth statement and both truth and morality are separate according to you.

I keep on having to remind you that you are not a mind reader. Because if you could read minds you wouldn't keep straw-manning my arguments.

False, straw-manning is strictly the inevitable "entropy" you cannot stop...no matter how hard you try.

That is if you want to take it as "straw-manning".

However in light of your claims that that truth and morality are seperate...I am just connecting the dots. What you expect all your posts to exist as seperate thoughts? That is just schizophrenic.

Face it, morality and truth are seperate according to you...there is no objective morality. You just make up whatever you...well...how to word it? There is a reason you feel threatened by philosophy...it just exposes how divided you are.

But that is not really a bad thing, or good...everything entropies, including your arguments. You become what you fear.

[Logik]

False, straw-manning is strictly the inevitable "entropy" you cannot stop...no matter how hard you try.

No. It's just a choice. Your choice. And you are just a man - man can be stopped. Trivially.

However in light of your claims that that truth and morality are seperate...I am just connecting the dots. What you expect all your posts to exist as seperate thoughts? That is just schizophrenic.

What I expect you to understand is why I had to separate them. So that I can explain them to you in parts, before putting them back together.
Alas, you are a 20-something year old who has yet to tame his temper, his anger, his rebelliousness. So you jump to conclusions.

The only "Truth" is moral truth. Everything else is <insert some label here>. Facts? Knowledge?

[Eodnhoj7]

False, straw-manning is strictly the inevitable "entropy" you cannot stop...no matter how hard you try.

No. It's just a choice. Your choice. And you are just a man - man can be stopped. Trivially.

Entropy, as a process of divergence, observes "choice" itself as equal to or subject to higher laws that ground space.

Entropy is strictly an inversion of one phenomenon to many phenomenon, and as such it is grounded in "void".

However in light of your claims that that truth and morality are seperate...I am just connecting the dots. What you expect all your posts to exist as seperate thoughts? That is just schizophrenic.

What I expect you to understand is why I had to separate them. So that I can explain them to you in parts, before putting them back together.
Alas, you are a 20-something year old who has yet to tame his temper, his anger, his rebelliousness. So you jump to conclusions.

Rebelliousness? Please you are a libertarian.

The only "Truth" is moral truth. Everything else is <insert some label here>. Facts? Knowledge?

I see, the only "truth" is "moral" truth...and if morality is a "way of being" and all phenomenon have some degree of consciousness as they are grounded in space (which is the root of consciousness), then all "being" has a truth value to it.

[Logik]

I see, the only "truth" is "moral" truth...and if morality is a "way of being" and all phenomenon have some degree of consciousness as they are grounded in space (which is the root of consciousness), then all "being" has a truth value to it.

Why do you always default to ontological arguments? Why don't you ever examine the systemic/behaviouristic angle?

[Eodnhoj7]

I see, the only "truth" is "moral" truth...and if morality is a "way of being" and all phenomenon have some degree of consciousness as they are grounded in space (which is the root of consciousness), then all "being" has a truth value to it.

Why do you always default to ontological arguments? Why don't you ever examine the systemic/behaviouristic angle?

Why do you always put some pseudophilosophical label on and claim you want to kill philosophy when all you are doing to perpetuating it?

Second; because context composes all being as being in itself..."all is space".

[Logik]

Why do you always put some pseudophilosophical label on and claim you want to kill philosophy when all you are doing to perpetuating it?

Way to miss the Forrest for the trees. I am demonstrating why philosophy is the Theism of the 21st century... And your responses are helping me make my case.

Second; because context composes all being as being in itself..."all is space".

You forgot time. Spacetime...

[Eodnhoj7]

Why do you always put some pseudophilosophical label on and claim you want to kill philosophy when all you are doing to perpetuating it?

Second; because context composes all being as being in itself..."all is space".

You forgot time. Spacetime...

False; Time is space.

Space is unified.
Time is multiplied/divided space. Void is nothingness, not even space, hence time is space unraveling through void.

All is space, time is just finite space as multiple infinities.

[Logik]

False; Time is space.

No... It isn't.

Space is unified.
Time is multiplied/divided space. Void is nothingness, not even space, hence time is space unraveling through void.

All is space, time is just finite space as multiple infinities.

And that's why murder is wrong?

[Eodnhoj7]

False; Time is space.

No... It isn't.

Actually it really is. If I progress from point A to point B, through time...time exists as the expansion of space; hence the multiplication of space. Time is space.

Space is unified.
Time is multiplied/divided space. Void is nothingness, not even space, hence time is space unraveling through void.

All is space, time is just finite space as multiple infinities.

And that's why murder is wrong?

Considering all morality is grounded in timing through context (self-defense and murder are differentiated through context)...then yes.