Just remember, at your age she is not the first man she had an orgasm too...she cried out other names before...and due to entropy may again at some other point when she get's bored....money and wealth tend to do that after a while because they lack "quality". But then again who is to know? Maybe she is "different" than other women...at least that is what all men say when they fall in love, I know I have.
Second, no heroism...I already covered the ourboros...It is an anthropomorphization of the inherent cycles which reflect through all of reality that observes the process of "maintainance" (snake is maintained by eating itself) and "dissolution" (snake is dissolved into further snakes because it eats itself) observed in the Prime Triad.
Multiple discoveries reflect this "ourboros" where certain key elements are observed "spontaneously" popping up from the void of the psyche, but as observed in the "impossibility of randomness thread" what we observe is that a spontaneously observed particle (in this case the discovery as atomic fact(s)) always has an underlying symmetry to another spontaneously observed particle (atomic fact(s) in this case again) and as such observe a continual repitition of key elements of symmetry conducive to a cycle in and of itself.
As to me already addressing the ourboros; this is just fact:
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=23122&p=340655&hil ... os#p340655
Re: Time, Reciprocal Containment, & The Ouroboros
Post by Eodnhoj7 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 11:43 am
While time may be observed, symmetrically, through the nature of the ouroboros as perpetual movement the problem occurs as to the nature of "constants" or "stability" being properly defined.
These concepts manifest themselves with some degree of evidence through the nature of time, however inherently must reflect something deeper. While certain aspects of these concepts morph through the perpetual movement of time, the vary observation of them implies something that transcends time itself. This nature of transcendence past movement provides some foundation for the nature of definition, part of which can be observed in the ouroboros itself.
The inherent act of relying upon a constant geometric nature implies, that while the ourboros is a thing in itself, some aspects of it reflect some other dimension that exists alongside itself.
Perpetual movement, as time, gives grounding for stable elements to be observed within the nature of knowledge as "perpetual movement" is duely a "constant" in a separate respect.
At best the Ouroboros symbolizes the inherent cyclic nature of physical reality that is present in both atoms, stars and much of the behavior exhibited by the people in between. At its worst it manifests itself as a philosophical locking mechanism that prevents the observation of any further knowledge.
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=23299&p=344715&hil ... os#p344715
Re: God is testing us all
Post by Eodnhoj7 » Fri Dec 22, 2017 8:02 pm
NSKimura wrote: ↑
Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:39 pm
Sorry but you have to be a troll. I say that atheism is the denial that God exists and you conclude that God indeed exists because atheists deny his existence.
Or are you since you keep repeating the words "nonsense" and "absurd"?
The premise is simple, the atheists keep redefining "nothingness" into something. A metaphor is needed here to answer your question:
It would be equivalent to wolves raising sheep to eat them. They claim the sheep have no power, but the wolves need them in order to exist. The sheep just eat and continue moving on. The problem, metaphorically speaking, is that the wolves raising sheep eventually lead to rams coming into existence. The rams in turn kill the wolves. So they raise cattle instead, and what happens but bulls come into existence and the wolves are still stuck in the circular pattern they seek to avoid.
Atheism creates its own beast. They don't understand that by saying God doesn't exist they actually create one to fight against. Would it be better to say that man is God for the atheist, and that he continually eats himself to sustain himself? Much like the metaphorical ourboros? Does the atheist offer anything moral value besides a savage hate premised on continual negation?
Atheism is the origin of all savagery and it is a disease of the mind. It is universal and extends across all faiths. We see it when we insult the poor, or when spouses commit adultery. We see it when we raise children that they are nothing unless they achieve wealth and fame. We see it in ourselves when we say we are not good enough.
The simple truth is that I did not create any of these arguments, you did by staring into the void. You made arguments and I responded. Is that not what this thread about? A response?
So by your nonsense logic, if I imagine a being, anything I fancy, and deny its existence, then it exists.... the same for everyone, if they deny the existence of something it exists or else we cannot deny its existence.
Atheists gather together all the time to talk about the Spaghetti Monster. Its a bit ironic to equate God to a food group they desire to eat...isn't it? Or is it since they gather to gain spiritual and intellectual sustainance from agreement with eachother? Either way, the idea becomes their God and it steers the course of the rest of their lives.
This is it for me. Thank you very much for showing me that there are people like you out there. This is why people, lots of people, and most scientists, dislike philosophy, because of people like you, because of nonsense such as what you spread here.
Scientists spend most of their time studying Dark Matter, something they cannot see, and yet says it exists. It has become a pure religion whose dogma is mere equations that perpetually change. It is has become a faith whose sole purpose is to stare into the dark and ask "Who am I". Do you understand one possible interpretation for M theory they offer? "Magic Theory". And that is "science"? Or is it hypocrisy?
Why quit if you know so much? I am only getting started, this is easy for me because I know that I know less than you do. Can you say the same? You know more than me don't you?
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=24034&p=357795&hil ... os#p357795
Peace and Happiness are "Dirty" Words.
Post by Eodnhoj7 » Wed May 02, 2018 11:49 am
It appears to me that the pursuit of Peace and Happiness causes an absence of Peace and Happiness as the pursuit of what is Potential causes a division of what is actual.
A pursuit of what is by nature subjective causes a division of what is objective, with objectivity being a form of group subjectivity.
With the division of the group subjectivity, as what is objectivity, causes an division of what is subjective as group subjectivity (objectivity) provides the boundaries through which the subjective exists.
The subjective pitted against the objective requires a subjective "sacrifice of the self through the self" in which the individual must divide into parts himself/herself in order gain the necessary relations which allow the individual to move through time and space. He who is hungry must in terms eat himself in order to satisify any intellectual, physical or emotional desire in the face of adversity.
A spiritual of the "ourboros" takes hold in which the individual must loop through himself to maintain himself in the face of percieved chaos, where the ability to "loop" and intertwine oneself through the environment is not a viable option.
The individual is forced to dismember oneself, through an act of intellectual hanging and a piercing of the heart under the linear spear of progressive change, much in the same manner the anthropormized god of Madness, Fury and Wisdom, Oden or Wotan, committed in the pursuit of "opening" himself to the multiplicity of existence. This hanging upon the universal tree of Yggdrasil, or the Tree of Knowledge in Western Judaic Tradition, causes a form of false knowledge through suicide to occur in the respect that seperation of the self causes an appearance of Knowledge to occur under the term "relation".
Relativism in these respects results in a "Satanic" spirituality in which constant division of the self is required in the face of a highly individualistic subjective culture. A deification of oneself and their faculties of reasoning results due to a process of constant individuation in which the individual alone is falsely responsible for the totatily of truth rather than as a mediator or "steward" of it.
This deification, or seeking equality to Godhood, causes a false form of spirituality in the respect that any pursuit of equality implies a division with this division being "actualized" in the respect is it spoken and believed. A problem occurs when an problem is observed as a problem, and these problems are merely observations of seperation. To seek equality is to imply a seperation, but the nature of equality requires a full knowing of what these percievable seperate natures entail.
In simpler terms if man seeks equality with God, a Knowing of God must first occur in the respect a boundary must be given. This boundary, or measurement, however requires a measurement of the measurement, ad-infinitum where a process of continual division occurs under the manifestation of categories that are oftentimes subjective evident. To create God-hood would require a knowing of what God-hood entails, but this knowing would require a continual act of belief in oneself which further causes the very problem of relativism to occur.
The pursuit of divinity, under the terms "peace" and "happiness", becomes a dirty process of synthesis where continual separation into parts lays waste to what is simple and buries it under an idol of "complexity" as a re measurement is believed necessary to give order to the subjective universe that paradoxically is not objectively agreed upon at the group level except under the terms "individuation".
Spatial Tearing, Modern Baal Worship and Satanic Ritualism
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26140&p=395532&hili ... os#p395532