Non-sequitur. You'd need to learn logic.Logik wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:55 amYou don't use logic to express statements about the quantum world? Strange!Speakpigeon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:49 am Sure, and that why its's called "logic" and not quantum mechanics!
I'm not a physicist so there's no reason I would discuss QM physics.
I can conceive that the logic of the human brain might not be enough to talk about QM meaningfully.
I have yet to see any example of that, though.
In fact, I'm dead certain there's no difficulty.
Although, there are plenty of idiots who may think there are.
So, if you have an example of QM that's problematic, I'm interested.
Change the way the brain works?!
The way the brain works is the result of 525 million years of natural selection, at least.
Only idiots would want to downgrade to Logik's logic.
I don't.
You're just delusional.
That doesn't mean anything.
I use language to represent, describe, talk about reality.
And I'm using English here, which I had to learn as a foreign language. This shows I'm very flexible.
No real problem, no. Tell me where there would be a problem.
We use logic but we also use mathematics, science, engineering, computer,s the arts, gestures, acts, etc.
However, the reason we're able to do all that is because of the logical capability of the human brain.
Apples are oranges?
You change your language to make sure it doesn't fit reality.
EB