Argument for New Laws of Identity.

[Eodnhoj7]

New Laws of Identity


1) P (All Identity is Form)

2) PpP (All identity is Function)

3) Pp (All identity is Function and Form)


Laws 1 through 3 progress towards eachother, while simultaneously cycling back to the original Law. The laws exist as 3 in 1 and 1 and 3.




Presented Argument:

1) P

All identity exists as a self evident constant that maintains itself through a process of mirroring/replication. P represents all qualities and quantities as infinities.

For example the cat exists because the cat mirrors/replicates through time. The cat is both composed of and composes various types of cats, with the cat as a quality observing an infinite number of grades of Cat. The cat, as a quality, is a complex set of limits which mirror continually.

The same applies for the number. 1,2,3, etc. mirror/replicate through an infinite number of further numbers.

P strictly exists as is and because it mirror/replicates itself ad-infinitum through a variety of grades, it is merely a quantity/quality in its own right.

P strictly is a point from which all further qualities and quantities exist and invert in turn further seperate quantities/qualities through P.


P is strictly form as infinite function leading to Law 2.






2) PpP

All P observes itself as a finite quality/quantity, that exists as multiple localities. All finiteness is a multiplicity of infinities.

"p" observes an infinite number of connectors/seperators including but not limited to "equal", "=", "is", "tends towards" etc. with these connectors/separators. observing an infinite number of expressions. "p" follows the same form and function as rule 1.

For example, to argue P=P is to observe an inherent seperation for what is connected to something else observes a fundamental seperation in a different respect. P is directed towards P which in turn is directed back towards itself. P is directed towards itself through itself as a circularity.

"p" as "equals" observes the same form and function as P where it is expressed in multiple states through "P". "equals" exists because of "P", along with "is", etc.

Considering the example P=P, necessitate a form of circularity, P directed towards P observes a linear progressive statement where P is directed away from itself and become multiplicitous in nature. P exists in multiple states in these respects.

P is form. p is function. A function may be directed in a circular nature leading to P as circular, or it may be directed in a linear nature leading to P as progressive. All circularity is an alternation of linear direction and all linear direction is dependent upon a circularity to maintain it.

P exists through p as a function where p is an infinite function in itself conducive to P






3)Pp

All identity is Function and Form

"p" is lower case because it is strictly an observation of function, where "P" is an observation of form. Function and form, while inseperable, may be inverted considering they are one and the same but observed as multiples through relation.

Pp are both one and the same progressing to both Laws 1 and 2 while cycling back to itself.

[Impenitent]

forgive me, but it isn't identified just because you p on it...

-Imp

[Eodnhoj7]

forgive me, but it isn't identified just because you p on it...

-Imp

What a Pp statement.