## P = -P

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Terrapin Station
Posts: 3557
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

### Re: P = -P

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:34 am
Referencing is pointing, pointing is observation, thus referencing is observation.
"NOT the act of referencing."
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 6815
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

### Re: P = -P

Terrapin Station wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:03 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:34 am
Referencing is pointing, pointing is observation, thus referencing is observation.
"NOT the act of referencing."
No.

And again:

The act of referencing is pointing, to point is to observe, thus the act of referencing is the act of observation.
Terrapin Station
Posts: 3557
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

### Re: P = -P

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 12:47 am
Terrapin Station wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:03 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:34 am
Referencing is pointing, pointing is observation, thus referencing is observation.
"NOT the act of referencing."
No.

And again:

The act of referencing is pointing, to point is to observe, thus the act of referencing is the act of observation.
In other words if you're talking about the act of referencing, you're not even addressing my comments, because that is NOT what I'm talking about.
Skepdick
Posts: 7928
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

### Re: P = -P

Terrapin Station wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:03 am "NOT the act of referencing."
Terrapin Station wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:22 am In other words if you're talking about the act of referencing, you're not even addressing my comments, because that is NOT what I'm talking about.
Lol! Recursion.

The referencer is referencing the act of referencing.

WHY are you referencing the act of referencing?