Freedom: An Impossible Reality by Raymond Tallis

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Philosophy Now
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:49 am

Freedom: An Impossible Reality by Raymond Tallis

Post by Philosophy Now »

This issue we consider ultimate human realities as Raymond Tallis has the intention of proving free will.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/149/Freedom_An_Impossible_Reality_by_Raymond_Tallis
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9939
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Freedom: An Impossible Reality by Raymond Tallis

Post by attofishpi »

Philosophy Now wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2023 3:36 am This issue we consider ultimate human realities as Raymond Tallis has the intention of proving free will.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/149/Fr ... ond_Tallis
RE reading Tallis' book, personally - not for me. I think the only way to get 'philosophical' about free will is via talking about neuroscience and QM. Sir Roger Penrose & Hameroff are interesting to read/utube on this area.

This term 'agency' gets on my nerves, why introduce a word when it is not required and philosophy tends to do this, when it adds extra definition to a word (that was not required) for the argument.

It's like a theortical physicist adding some extra 'dimension', or particle, multiverse etc ...WHERE we need to work from our basic grass roots and stop confusing our comprehension - of reality.

..btw there is an intelligence at the backbone to sub-atomic reality that we perceive (just to contradict myself :mrgreen: )
owl of Minerva
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:16 pm

Re: Freedom: An Impossible Reality by Raymond Tallis

Post by owl of Minerva »

Agency is a problematic word when it comes to free will, it is difficult to find a substitute. Its literal meaning is one through which something is accomplished: INSTRUMENTALITY, which does not exactly imply free will.

Mid-last century Sir John Eccles won a Noble prize for showing how chemical and electrical impulses, the ‘firing mechanism’ caused the movement of a finger.

He found that the source was still elusive until subsequent research showed that the ‘firing mechanism’ still took place with thought, even if the finger was not moved. As a result Eccles’ view was that the physiology of movement proved that we have freedom of will, that something outside of a purely mechanical process is involved in our actions. He concluded that we have the mental ability to decide to act. if done on an elementary level—-moving a finger—-it followed that it could be done with more complex levels of human action and interaction.
Post Reply