So, is Rick Lewis a stomach-ignoring philosopher, or whot?
Why is there not a 'Philosophy of Food' forum ?
Questions are hanging out there...and here...
I reckon I am a stomach-affirming type. Currently 5 kgs overweight.
But I have a bold plan...gonna read some Watson...is he a doctor ?
Richard Watson was a trailblazer of sorts. In 1985, the Washington University professor published a book which combined dieting tips with ruminations on the big questions of life. The combination was not so far fetched as it seemed. The very word ‘diet’ is derived from a Greek term meaning ‘mode of life.’ Since a proper mode of living involves good nutrition, the word soon took on connotations associated with food. Watson called his book The Philosopher’s Diet: How to Lose Weight and Change the World. If his title played on the original, now lost, sense of ‘diet’, his philosophical colleagues would probably not have noticed. For them, food and food practices were alien and unwelcome intrusions into a rarefied atmosphere where people could debate forever on whether a brain in a vat, suitably wired to stimulate sensation, might think that it was actually a complete human being roaming about in the world
Is it time to eat The Brain in a vat?
Stomach-affirming philosophers can finally put an end to reflection which has selected an unreal, fantasy state as its starting point. They can begin to concern themselves with real worries, genuine concerns, the problems of humans, not the problems of philosophers. They can approach the world as live creatures in a live world. Stomach-gifted creatures are constantly asking questions, not only what is for dinner, but how can we articulate a philosophy devoted to ‘artful living’.
© Ray Boisvert 2001
Is it better to get leaner and mean...er... something...in the real world?
Who really cares about Mary and zombies anyway...only philosophers.
On the other hand, a red tomato...yum
I think a forum dedicated to Food would be yummy, what do you think ?