Language versus Grammar

What did you say? And what did you mean by it?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Phil8659
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:50 am
Contact:

Language versus Grammar

Post by Phil8659 »

The Philosopher, Plato, left mankind a number of dialogs. I have edited several of the translations for a machine reader I made which automatically switches voices so that one can listen to those dialogs as many people really do not have either time to read, or would like to give their mind something to do while they are engaged in menial tasks. Those edits can be recovered from a pdf portfolio called Xenophon to Plato in the Nude, on the Internet Archive.
I did that work because those dialogs are a help to learning grammar as Plato did not teach Platonism, but Grammar and how it is used to make judgments with. Secondly, Plato seems to have been the only philosopher, outside the source of the Judeo-Christian Scriptures which knew where one begins in learning Grammar.
One begins learning Grammar by examining the question, exactly what can anyone name such that what we can name is not something particular but something intelligible? The ability to ask this question takes a distinction in levels of intelligence, as most people believe that the origins of names can be discovered by archaeologist by digging in dirt, in fact, Plato made fun of this approach in Cratylus.
In order to discover, what we can name, Plato intimated in Parmenides, geometry. Pairing of two systems of naming. Make the simplest thing possible, a line segment, and name the elements of that thing with common grammar names. It turns out that one can name the correlatives, which Plato called nouns, and the relative, Plato called verbs. It is that simple. We can name the limits of any relative difference. Aristotle taught this in his work. We name the form, the material. We combine them and name the combination, using the concept of a container, or again the correlative, and this combination defines that correlative. This is called binary recursion which Plato called Dialectic, grammar in accordance with the two elements of a thing.

Today, we have a machine which can process any system of grammar, and be used to modify any behavior using simple binary recursion and it is called the computer.

Now, as every thing is defined by physical and biological fact as a binary, what then is the difference between Language and Grammar as they are both claimed to be some thing? It is a distinction few have the wit to realize, but which even Aristotle tried to express. The difference is between the perceptible and the intelligible. The reason most do not make this distinction is obvious, lack of intelligence.
As every thing is a binary expression, the distinction between Language and Grammar is between them is the same as between the particular and the universal, a binary distinction. So, as the Universe is composed of everything, Language is Universal and Intelligible, which Grammar is Particular and Perceptible. This language and that language is simply a way of denoting a system of grammar. Nobody can teach language as it is a biological given, while systems of grammar can be taught if, and only if, an idiot is not trying to teach it and an idiot claims to be able to learn it.

Now, nobody seems to have the intelligence to take the second step and ask how many categories of grammar does binary recursion afford us? Instead they use the simple minded form of This language and that language, meaning a particular system of grammar. Doing this, they miss displaying the intelligence they claim to have. A grammar system is again, binary. Its two parts are composed of symbol sets and methods of applying those symbols to make the grammar. Every grammar is a method of utilizing binary recursion. Thus we have symbols as a given, and behavior as a method of using those symbols all to produce a method of binary recursion.
Two squared, if I got my math right, produces four, and only four, primitive categories of grammar which is called a Grammar Matrix and we can name them using traditional names: Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.

Many people claim that logic, the art of names, differs from logic, i.e. fuzzy logic, Aristotelian Logic, apple pie logic, as if we can just toss names around while always being too stupid to know the simple facts about grammar as a physical and biological given which we can only discover if we have the wit to do it.
Every grammar rests on two facts, a convention of producing names, and a method of manipulating those names such that we effect, binary recursion, the very definition of a thing itself. Yet this has yet to be done in history, no one has had the wit to do it, or to even realize it save a very few, intolerably few people in history.
As the computer demonstrates, if you cannot even manage the principles of binary recursion, you are not only illiterate, you are simply brain dead.
You can bandy words about all you like, speak as much gibberish as you like, but you are obviously too ignorant and witless to make yourself a correct grammar book.

One can also discover much of this if they had the wit to define a thing, which geometry helps them with by having one make the simplest thing possible, that line segment. However, one will not find the definition of a thing in any dictionary I have seen.

A thing is also called, using other common grammar names, a standard of behavior. Literacy is only possible for a species when that species has evolved to the point of being able to impose standards of behavior in the construction of a grammar. This has not yet been accomplished by mankind.

One of the greatest works of Metaphor, the Judeo-Christian Scripture is a puzzle Book which it even claims will not be readable until a certain time in human history. It repeats this several times throughout the work. So, here it is, Language is God, the intelligible binary which produces the Universe. That which creates everything is simply the definition of a thing itself. God was given as a Universal, and Adam and Eve a particular example of that Universal. Adam and Eve are a Conjugate Binary Pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produce the human race, or the life of Man. The very same definition of a system of grammar, the very same definition of a computer.
Imagine that. Binary recursion can only produce a binary result, or judgment, the purpose of a mind, to predict the behavior of anything simply uses the Law of Identity. The mind is based on memory. The processing of memory relies on binary recursion. The results can either be that of an idiot, or that of the literate. An idiot can never know its own stupidity as, again Plato pointed out, relation to self is inadmissible.
Post Reply