What having a philosophical conversation with AGE looks and feels like.

[Age]

He/she sometimes makes a good point but never agrees on facts, like others in this forum.

Name a so-called 'fact', which I do not agree with.

[Dontaskme]

All known facts are fictions.

[bahman]

He/she sometimes makes a good point but never agrees on facts, like others in this forum.

Name a so-called 'fact', which I do not agree with.

Like regress is logically impossible.

[Age]

He/she sometimes makes a good point but never agrees on facts, like others in this forum.

Name a so-called 'fact', which I do not agree with.

Like regress is logically impossible.

How do you define the 'regress' word?

[bahman]

Name a so-called 'fact', which I do not agree with.

Like regress is logically impossible.

How do you define the 'regress' word?

Something that is unbound, even beyond infinity.

[Age]

Like regress is logically impossible.

How do you define the 'regress' word?

Something that is unbound, even beyond infinity.

LOL 'Infinity', Itself, is 'unbound'. So, how could there, logically, be a 'thing' MORE 'unbound', or BEYOND, 'infinity'?

Also, because the Universe, Itself, which exists, IS infinite, or unbound, then this PROVES that an UNBOUND 'thing', like 'regress', itself could exist also, and thus 'logically possible'.

[Dontaskme]

LOL 'Infinity', Itself, is 'unbound'. So, how could there, logically, be a 'thing' MORE 'unbound', or BEYOND, 'infinity'?

Also, because the Universe, Itself, which exists, IS infinite, or unbound, then this PROVES that an UNBOUND 'thing', like 'regress', itself could exist also, and thus 'logically possible'.

All ''things'' exist as ''concepts'' only.

Concepts are everything and nothing simultaneously right here, right now. . nowhere NOW-HE-Re

A re-write of what's already been written..a re-play of what's already happened.

[Age]

LOL 'Infinity', Itself, is 'unbound'. So, how could there, logically, be a 'thing' MORE 'unbound', or BEYOND, 'infinity'?

Also, because the Universe, Itself, which exists, IS infinite, or unbound, then this PROVES that an UNBOUND 'thing', like 'regress', itself could exist also, and thus 'logically possible'.

All ''things'' exist as ''concepts'' only.

Since ONLY human beings, or animals, have 'concepts'. This INFERS that to the 'thing' known here as "dontaskme" NO 'things' existed BEFORE 'you', human beings, or 'concepts' came into Existence. Which, OBVIOUSLY, the ABSURDITY of this SPEAKS for ITSELF.

Concepts are everything and nothing simultaneously right here, right now. . nowhere NOW-HE-Re.

Or, in other words, 'It' is ALL in the Mind.

Of which, as 'I' SAY, there is ONLY One.

A re-write of what's already been written..a re-play of what's already happened.

[Dontaskme]

Since ONLY human beings, or animals, have 'concepts'. This INFERS that to the 'thing' known here as "dontaskme" NO 'things' existed BEFORE 'you', human beings, or 'concepts' came into Existence. Which, OBVIOUSLY, the ABSURDITY of this SPEAKS for ITSELF.

But I never inferred that ...you did..so shush your mush...and stop projecting your self-speaking absurdity's as if they were mine, when they are clearly yours.

[bahman]

How do you define the 'regress' word?

Something that is unbound, even beyond infinity.

LOL 'Infinity', Itself, is 'unbound'. So, how could there, logically, be a 'thing' MORE 'unbound', or BEYOND, 'infinity'?

Also, because the Universe, Itself, which exists, IS infinite, or unbound, then this PROVES that an UNBOUND 'thing', like 'regress', itself could exist also, and thus 'logically possible'.

No, infinity is unreachable.

[Age]

Since ONLY human beings, or animals, have 'concepts'. This INFERS that to the 'thing' known here as "dontaskme" NO 'things' existed BEFORE 'you', human beings, or 'concepts' came into Existence. Which, OBVIOUSLY, the ABSURDITY of this SPEAKS for ITSELF.

But I never inferred that ...you did..so shush your mush...and stop projecting your self-speaking absurdity's as if they were mine, when they are clearly yours.

'you', the 'thing' here labelled, and known, as "dontaskme", wrote; "All ''things'' exist as ''concepts'' only.". Now, if this does NOT infer that ALL 'things'exist as 'concepts', ONLY, then what does this infer, EXACTLY?

[Age]

Something that is unbound, even beyond infinity.

LOL 'Infinity', Itself, is 'unbound'. So, how could there, logically, be a 'thing' MORE 'unbound', or BEYOND, 'infinity'?

Also, because the Universe, Itself, which exists, IS infinite, or unbound, then this PROVES that an UNBOUND 'thing', like 'regress', itself could exist also, and thus 'logically possible'.

No, infinity is unreachable.

Infinitely is, SUPPOSEDLY, unreachable by who or what EXACTLY?

ALSO, existing and unreachable are two VERY DIFFERENT things anyway.

[Dontaskme]

'you', the 'thing' here labelled, and known, as "dontaskme", wrote; "All ''things'' exist as ''concepts'' only.".

Yes, that's right, all ''things'' exist as ''concepts'' only.

Now, if this does NOT infer that ALL 'things'exist as 'concepts', ONLY, then what does this infer, EXACTLY?

It infers that all ''things'' exist as ''concepts'' only.

[bahman]

LOL 'Infinity', Itself, is 'unbound'. So, how could there, logically, be a 'thing' MORE 'unbound', or BEYOND, 'infinity'?

Also, because the Universe, Itself, which exists, IS infinite, or unbound, then this PROVES that an UNBOUND 'thing', like 'regress', itself could exist also, and thus 'logically possible'.

No, infinity is unreachable.

Infinitely is, SUPPOSEDLY, unreachable by who or what EXACTLY?

ALSO, existing and unreachable are two VERY DIFFERENT things anyway.

Infinity: a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number.

[Advocate]

But where's your PROOF that you feel that way?