Re: Dichotomy and anomolies beyond etymology of English
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:25 am
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
Deepak? What are you talking about? A spiritual doosh.Atla wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:21 amThat's rich, coming from you who is totally David Icke - Deepak Chopra.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:11 am...and when human start running out of resources, they will need to simulate reality, to become more efficient. This may have already occurred.
Yeah, just tickling what I saw of the David Icke in you.
There's a lot more than just the 'messing' with the English language. It is a natural part of intelligence sentient evolution as resources become limited, that they 'evolve' into a simulation. Their 'deity' being A.I.
Then what are you waiting for.
It is a spurious correlation. There is no point.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:30 am Part 1. EVIL LIVE
Part 2. A man's best friend is a DOG, reversed GOD.
Address the points in page one, or stop wasting my time.
It is also very hard to LIVE when SATAN is doing EVIL to you.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:00 am i stated, it is very hard to LIVE when 'God' is doing EVIL to you.
No I didn't, if you read my previous statement regarding EVIL and LIVE...i stated, it is very hard to LIVE when 'God' is doing EVIL to you. I never stated an antonym in this thread, it is a dichotomy sure, but not antonyms.TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 10:43 amIt is a spurious correlation. There is no point.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 9:30 am Part 1. EVIL LIVE
Part 2. A man's best friend is a DOG, reversed GOD.
Address the points in page one, or stop wasting my time.
It doesn't carry over to other languages.
In Russian :
God -> БОГ
Evil -> злой
Dog -> Собака
Live -> жить
In Spanish:
God -> Dios
Dog -> Perro
Live -> Vivir
Evil -> Mal
Not to mention that you have arbitrarily decided that the antonym of EVIL is LIVE. Is it?
Oh that's easy! The part where I have NO idea how you have come to the conclusion that English is THE protocol of planet Earthattofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:05 am ...and..what part of ENGLISH - THE common protocol of planet Earth don't you understand? ...so you start bringing foreign words into the fray.
Thats because you are a simple dipshit, you are talking about THE most POPULIST language. The COMMON protocol language between nations is ENGLISH.TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:08 amOh that's easy! The part where I have NO idea how you have come to the conclusion that English is THE protocol of planet Earthattofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:05 am ...and..what part of ENGLISH - THE common protocol of planet Earth don't you understand? ...so you start bringing foreign words into the fray.
Far more people speak Mandarin (or as we dummies call it - Chinese): https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/02/ ... languages/
So I guess you could say: I reject your premise? On the grounds of it being a bandwagon fallacy.
Ahhhh. Moving the goalposts I see.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:11 am You are a dipshit, you are talking about THE most POPULIST language. The COMMON protocol language between nations is ENGLISH.
People derail threads when they are losing, nice attempt. Talk about goalpost moving!TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:12 amAhhhh. Moving the goalposts I see.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:11 am You are a dipshit, you are talking about THE most POPULIST language. The COMMON protocol language between nations is ENGLISH.
The most COMMON protocol between nations is TCP/IP.
People claim derailment when their premises are challenged.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:13 am People derail threads when they are losing, nice attempt.
You haven't come close to challenging the premise - simply because you haven't the gumption to comprehend the premise. You argue like a teen twat on cocaine.TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:14 amPeople claim derailment when their premises are challenged.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:13 am People derail threads when they are losing, nice attempt.
Alternative hypothesis: you haven't come close to understand the challenge. Because you lack the knowledge/background in linguistics OR propositional logic.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:15 am You haven't come close to challenging the premise - simply because you haven't the gumption to comprehend the premise.
You insult similarly.
Really - this was part of your argument:-TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:16 amAlternative hypothesis: you haven't come close to understand the challenge. Because you lack the knowledge/background in linguistics OR propositional logic.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:15 am You haven't come close to challenging the premise - simply because you haven't the gumption to comprehend the premise.