henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:50 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:44 am
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:48 pm
I know -- as fact -- there's nuthin' of value in that exchange.
SO, without reading what has been written, the one here known as "henry quirk" CLAIMS that it CAN KNOW, FOR SURE, if there IS, or IS NOT, ABSOLUTELY ANY 'value' AT ALL in those UNSEEN written works.
No.
After throwin' the lot of you out of the box:
I read the exchange.
It's worthless.
OKAY. But it is Truly UNWORTHY of mentioning. So, literally, of absolutely NO value AT ALL to me in you mentioning it.
Now, what are you saying 'no' to, EXACTLY?
Are you saying 'no' to that you can ACTUALLY KNOW, FOR SURE, what IS, and what IS NOT, of 'value' in "other's" UNSEEN writings, or are you saying 'no' to some thing ELSE?
Because if you are 'trying to' REFUTE what I said above, then you will have to do MUCH BETTER than just saying the 'no' word, UNDERSTOOD?