powell's kraken?

General chit-chat

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by henry quirk »

We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

reads less like mea culpa and more like under duress but, as you like flash
Walker
Posts: 14347
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

Here’s an interesting news item for government investigators and investigative reporters to track down while diligently at work on the case.

Quote:

The Italian Job: Explosive New Testimony on Dominion Election Fraud
By
Jeff Stevens
Published on January 6, 2021
https://www.shockya.com/news/2021/01/06 ... ion-fraud/

A former IT contractor for the Italian military testified in federal court in Rome that while he was working for Leonardo, SpA in Pescara, Italy he helped rig the U.S. election against Trump by using the companies satellites; $1 billion in U.S. contracts now suspect

It was a solemn day in a federal court room in Rome, when Arturo d’Ello took the stand. The former employee of the 8th largest defense contractor in the world Leonardo SpA — which is partially owned by the Italian government –began his shocking testimony with the usual swearing in on the Bible. That was the last thing that was ordinary about the day.

As the crowd gasped, he outlined the scheme that proved successful in using Leonardo computer systems and military satellites located in Pescara, Italy to help Dominion steal the U.S. election for Joseph Biden. He explained how recent reports of a hack at Leonardo were orchestrated to cover their tracks.

The news connects the dots between Eric Coomer’s actions for Dominion Voting Systems in the U.S., the CIA raid in Frankfurt, Germany to protect Dominion’s servers and destroy the evidence of election fraud, and now the actions at Leonardo in Italy.

It even ropes in the deep state in the U.S. government. According to the Federal Enquirer, the U.S. government has awarded $1 billion in contracts to Leonardo SpA in the last year.

In a press release, Nations In Action, a government transparency organization, partnering with the Institute of Good Governance, stated, “This is the long awaited proof that a flawless plot to take down America was executed with extraordinary resources and global involvement. Americans and elected officials now have proof that the election was indeed stolen. This provides the mechanism for each state to recall their slate of electors immediately or face lawsuits and request all federal government agencies to lock down all internal communications, equipment and documentation from the Rome Embassy.”
“Make no mistake, this is a coup d’etat that we will stop in the name of justice and free and fair elections,” stated Maria Strollo Zack, Chairman of Nations in Action.

Greek billionaire Alki David has been a strong supporter of the search for evidence about the Dominion hack and has even gone so far as to offer $1 million to whoever can provide irrefutable evidence of Eric Coomer’s involvement in the hack. His team is now investigating 100s of leads that have come in. Keep up with Alki David and his efforts via his Instgaram.

End Quote
Walker
Posts: 14347
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 2:06 am We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

reads less like mea culpa and more like under duress but, as you like flash
It doesn't take a genius to see that the virtual communications pogram has begun.
tillingborn
Posts: 1314
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by tillingborn »

Walker wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:36 am
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 2:06 am We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

reads less like mea culpa and more like under duress but, as you like flash
It doesn't take a genius to see that the virtual communications pogram has begun.
You have to hand it to the bullshit spreaders. They are so good at spreading bullshit that when they tell the bullshit believers that the bullshit they spread is bullshit, the bullshit believers believe that the admission that the bullshit spread is bullshit, is bullshit.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by henry quirk »

as I say, this...

We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

...reads less like mea culpa and more like under duress but, as you like till
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:15 am ... connects the dots ... deep state ... flawless plot to take down America ... Instgaram.
Are your teeth picking up the CIA's interdimensional cable transmissions Walker?
If so you can get tin foil headgear to keep it together in there.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 2:06 am We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

reads less like mea culpa and more like under duress but, as you like flash
Well, yes. People who publish defamatory lies are often not the sort of people who publish a retraction just to correct the record like some sort of honest man would. So they publish them under duress, after their lawyers tell them their alternative is to lose in court because they have no evidence.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by henry quirk »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:37 pm
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 2:06 am We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

reads less like mea culpa and more like under duress but, as you like flash
Well, yes. People who publish defamatory lies are often not the sort of people who publish a retraction just to correct the record like some sort of honest man would. So they publish them under duress, after their lawyers tell them their alternative is to lose in court because they have no evidence.
mebbe so

could also be, the shysters advise look, it doesn't matter if you have the goods on dominion, they will bury you through process...most of your evidence will be buried...and even if you prove yourself, so what? you'll be a pauper, they'll have barely depleted their available resources, and none of it will get reported in a wide way...just print the retraction and move on
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:52 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:37 pm
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 2:06 am We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

reads less like mea culpa and more like under duress but, as you like flash
Well, yes. People who publish defamatory lies are often not the sort of people who publish a retraction just to correct the record like some sort of honest man would. So they publish them under duress, after their lawyers tell them their alternative is to lose in court because they have no evidence.
mebbe so

could also be, the shysters advise look, it doesn't matter if you have the goods on dominion, they will bury you through process...most of your evidence will be buried...and even if you prove yourself, so what? you'll be a pauper, they'll have barely depleted their available resources, and none of it will get reported in a wide way...just print the retraction and move on
The fact that one of their sources is a fantasist who pretended to be military intelligence to get attention, but was actually a car mechanic in the army ... that doesn't suggest they had a problematic evidentiary basis?
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by henry quirk »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:58 pm
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:52 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:37 pm
Well, yes. People who publish defamatory lies are often not the sort of people who publish a retraction just to correct the record like some sort of honest man would. So they publish them under duress, after their lawyers tell them their alternative is to lose in court because they have no evidence.
mebbe so

could also be, the shysters advise look, it doesn't matter if you have the goods on dominion, they will bury you through process...most of your evidence will be buried...and even if you prove yourself, so what? you'll be a pauper, they'll have barely depleted their available resources, and none of it will get reported in a wide way...just print the retraction and move on
The fact that one of their sources is a fantasist who pretended to be military intelligence to get attention, but was actually a car mechanic in the army ... that doesn't suggest they had a problematic evidentiary basis?
poor character doesn't discredit fact

I get the sense, bud, you're spoilin' for a fight

not me, not today

walker is your guy: go scratch your itch with him
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 4:12 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:58 pm
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:52 pm

mebbe so

could also be, the shysters advise look, it doesn't matter if you have the goods on dominion, they will bury you through process...most of your evidence will be buried...and even if you prove yourself, so what? you'll be a pauper, they'll have barely depleted their available resources, and none of it will get reported in a wide way...just print the retraction and move on
The fact that one of their sources is a fantasist who pretended to be military intelligence to get attention, but was actually a car mechanic in the army ... that doesn't suggest they had a problematic evidentiary basis?
poor character doesn't discredit fact
It completely discredits the declaration referenced here in the law suit you started this thread by posting.
HenryStartedThis.jpg
HenryStartedThis.jpg (31.9 KiB) Viewed 3093 times
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 4:12 pm I get the sense, bud, you're spoilin' for a fight

not me, not today

walker is your guy: go scratch your itch with him
Walker and Nick are hopelessly lost, they were dumb to begin with and thy will never emerge from a fantasy the enjoy.

But low key, you know that this is stupid, I can tell simply by the way you hedge your bets while those two fools are balls deep in the insanity.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by henry quirk »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 4:51 pm
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 4:12 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:58 pm
The fact that one of their sources is a fantasist who pretended to be military intelligence to get attention, but was actually a car mechanic in the army ... that doesn't suggest they had a problematic evidentiary basis?
poor character doesn't discredit fact
It completely discredits the declaration referenced here in the law suit you started this thread by posting.
HenryStartedThis.jpg

henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 4:12 pm I get the sense, bud, you're spoilin' for a fight

not me, not today

walker is your guy: go scratch your itch with him
Walker and Nick are hopelessly lost, they were dumb to begin with and thy will never emerge from a fantasy the enjoy.

But low key, you know that this is stupid, I can tell simply by the way you hedge your bets while those two fools are balls deep in the insanity.
no bets were or are hedged

my investment in all this is just slightly different than the average ORANGE MAN voter, is all

I love my hammer, it breaks, I bitch about it, then go get another hammer, not, they done took down my savior and now I'm gonna make 'em pay!

but, you know this about me, flash, or should

anyway: not gonna indulge you, not today
Walker
Posts: 14347
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:58 pm The fact that one of their sources is a fantasist who pretended to be military intelligence to get attention, but was actually a car mechanic in the army ... that doesn't suggest they had a problematic evidentiary basis?
Name?
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 9:59 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:58 pm The fact that one of their sources is a fantasist who pretended to be military intelligence to get attention, but was actually a car mechanic in the army ... that doesn't suggest they had a problematic evidentiary basis?
Name?
I shall give you the info again...
FlashDangerpants wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 1:17 pm I see you guys are still on this foolish rampage of bullshit. I can't be bothered with the 100 page shitehousery in the other thread, so here's a reminder in this one that the election theft story is a con perpetrated on sufferers of True Believer Syndrome.
Sidney Powell’s ‘Military Intelligence Expert’ Witness Was Actually an Army Mechanic Who Never Worked in Military Intelligence

Powell’s team described the witness in question as a “Military Intelligence expert” who would provide unambiguous proof that voting systems used in the election were compromised. The witness was known only as “Spyder” to protect him from an “established pattern of witness and attorney harassment and coercion,” Powell’s team wrote. But a Friday report from the Washington Post revealed that “Spyder,” whose real name is Joshua Merritt, was actually an army vehicle mechanic who had never even worked in military intelligence.
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/s ... ce-report/
Walker
Posts: 14347
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sun Jan 17, 2021 1:32 am I shall give you the info again...
Here's the names of Powell's forensic experts.

- Retired U.S. Army Col. Phil Waldron
- Dr. Kershavarz-Nia

You're off on some other kind of tangent.
Most likely the "rampage of bullshit" is in your head, and you're projecting again.
Post Reply