Walker wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:35 amYou don't know what you're talking about.tillingborn wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:23 am You and Walker have cobbled together a conspiracy which you both agree requires no evidence, because the source of information is logic. Think about this: you believe there is a leftist conspiracy to instal a senile President. You are the one saying he is senile.
American election.
-
tillingborn
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: American election.
Re: American election.
Who is the Big Guy?
Re: American election.
Re: American election.
No it wouldn't.
In the pause before the final exhalation, deservin’s got nothing to do with the crux of the biscuit.
As Clint advises, we all have it coming to us.
-
tillingborn
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: American election.
Do you mean the senile one? Every time I have read a link you have posted the source is overtly 'conservative'. Neon Nettle being the latest. One minute he's the Big Guy, the next he's a feeble patsy of the left; and whatever American Thinker tells you to think, without thinking, that's what you think. It may be contradictory, but at least it is coherent, which contrasts starkly with what you express when you do think for yourself:
Re: American election.
Remember, Confucius say, throwing stones while standing on fence may lose balance, cause trip, mash nuts.tillingborn wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 12:27 pmDo you mean the senile one? Every time I have read a link you have posted the source is overtly 'conservative'. Neon Nettle being the latest. One minute he's the Big Guy, the next he's a feeble patsy of the left; and whatever American Thinker tells you to think, without thinking, that's what you think. It may be contradictory, but at least it is coherent, which contrasts starkly with what you express when you do think for yourself:
Replace the l’s with r’s and you have part of a 50’s nightclub joke.
*
Oh yes. Who is the Big Guy?
You’re just being coy.
You know who the Big Guy is.
Fence strandlin’ is just peanut gallery stuff.
FLASHBACK: Biden: “Cannot Go To A 7-Eleven Or Dunkin' Donuts Unless You Have A Slight Indian Accent”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwqkpwV8j_A
-
tillingborn
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: American election.
So much for your logic:
Re: American election.
I know. You have nothing to say. Don't worry about it.
It's all right.
*
Leftists will tell you that the Big Guy is just guilty of being too friendly, and that it bothers some folks, and here’s why it bothers them and why they’re wrong to be bothered.
You know what the boss is saying when he paws your wife or daughter?
He is saying, I am abusing your goodwill because you need a job.
Some men won’t take it.
Some dopes don’t even see it.
At one Christmas party of years ago a secret service agent had to be restrained from ‘splain’ the facts of life to The Big Guy.
Watch Joe Biden give an endless hug to Hillary Clinton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSSMG0MaEnQ
The real irony? The VIP-VP will replace the VIP-P to become the first P with a record high identity-politics score … but not yet ready for prime time, as the primaries proved.
-
tillingborn
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: American election.
It is one thing to admit that you do not actually care about evidence:
It is quite another to do so after 20 pages of the stuff.
Re: American election.
Are you trying to project the behavior of Trump followers and/or yourself onto others?
Your logic and claims are clearly well over the cliff: you sound like a loon.
wtf?
You don't realize you're addicted to disinformation, do you?
Re: American election.
Some of the reactions to truth give clear meaning to the old saying:
"I weep for the future."
"I weep for the future."
Re: American election.
"Come on, man."
All your fluff is just puff and stuff.
The numbers tell the tale.
Lacewing and sidekick must be from that science-denier cult.
All your fluff is just puff and stuff.
The numbers tell the tale.
Lacewing and sidekick must be from that science-denier cult.
Re: American election.
Unlike the kind and patient IC, in the Information Age I feel somewhat less than generous when witnessing willful blindness and Doublethink under even these most benign of conditions.
Such ignorance indicates the probability of a crap-out when it comes time to decide, and being a worker bee rather than some political manipulator with a hack mentality who schemes around the edges for personal advantage, I’m inclined to not indulge either absurd proposals with inappropriate seriousness, or abject indoctrination either, for that matter.
The intellectual crap-out of others isn't my responsibility, rather, it's evidence.
It's evidence of intellectual cowardice.
What’s that you say?
Re: American election.
-
Immanuel Can
- Posts: 22527
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: American election.
That presumes the audience must remain persuadable by the evidence.tillingborn wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:23 am I gather you have never taken part in a debate; the whole point is to persuade the audience of one or other point of view.