For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
A very few of the environmentalists I know are not against it. It is about estimating risk of toxic waste as against demise of civilisation and our dear wild places.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:00 pmIronic, of course, since the environmentalists are all dead against it. The toxic waste problem is, admittedly a significant one, as are the other safety issues.
A very few of the environmentalists I know are not against it. It is about estimating risk of toxic waste as against demise of civilisation and our beloved wild places.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:00 pmIronic, of course, since the environmentalists are all dead against it. The toxic waste problem is, admittedly a significant one, as are the other safety issues.
Yeah, that's sometimes what it comes down to. It's the best of a questionable deal.Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:03 pmA very few of the environmentalists I know are not against it. It is about estimating risk of toxic waste as against demise of civilisation and our dear wild places.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:00 pmIronic, of course, since the environmentalists are all dead against it. The toxic waste problem is, admittedly a significant one, as are the other safety issues.