henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:20 pm
I don't need to own guns to live in a free society
mebbe not, but you probably need guns to secure
a free society
Is it just me or do "others" see the absolute hypocrisy and ridiculousness of thinking and proposing that to secure
a, so called, "free society", then guns are probably needed?
For the one's that think this sort of stuff, then please will you inform me of what 'it' actually IS, which guns will supposedly or probably secure and keep the "free society" from exactly?
From an outside perspective, what is observed is that the ONLY 'thing' that, so called, "free societies" on earth need to protect themselves from, with defense forces, weapons, and guns, is 'other', so called, "free societies".
From my perspective, the purchasing, securing, and keeping of guns, in order to protect yourselves, is just because you 'need' to protect yourselves from your own selves. The ONLY real danger, in the Universe, which 'you', human beings, NEED to protect yourselves from, is; 'you', human beings.
Because some of you own guns, then there is more, so called, "reason" you 'need' to, so call, "protect yourselves". If a human being with a gun, is one reason 'you' 'need' to 'protect' yourselves, which "justifies" the securing and the keeping of ANOTHER gun, then, hopefully, the idiosyncrasy of this is not lost on some.
If a human being with a gun is one thing you need to protect your self from, then, obviously if 'you', human beings, got rid of ALL of the guns, then there is one less thing, which 'you' need to, and have to, so call, ''protect'' yourselves from.
If one, supposedly, 'needs' to arm them self with a gun to, so call, "protect" them self from one armed with a gun, then what is actually 'needed' to prevent this most stupid of behavior would surely be PURE OBVIOUS, correct?