Faux outrage from a mediocre man over a staged event occurrin' within a staged event.promethean75 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:54 pm "Keep my wife's name outcha fuckin mowf" - Will Smith, a k.a. the fresh prince, 2022
promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 31, 2022 12:19 am "We're winning the war with Al Qaeda, but losing the war with Al Sharpton!" - Clayton Bigsby, black white supremacist and grand wizard of the KKK.
Livin' It Downhenry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 11:02 pmFaux outrage from a mediocre man over a staged event occurrin' within a staged event.promethean75 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:54 pm "Keep my wife's name outcha fuckin mowf" - Will Smith, a k.a. the fresh prince, 2022
Well, at least the ratings are up.
If you are MEANING or 'trying to' say and claim here; "Your mother", then 'you' OBVIOUSLY either did NOT know "my mother", or do NOT know what a 'woman' IS, EXACTLY.
The answer to your question is: the point is that a professional judge, as a judge, cannot say what a woman is. Your need for me to say what a woman is, is not my need. Nor is your need for me to say what a woman is, needed by the judge, for her to say what a woman is. Your need for me to say to you what a woman is, and your unstated and perhaps unrequited need to express what a woman is, is not needed by the judge to say what a woman is. What I say about a woman, or what you say about a woman, is not necessary for me to judge whether or not a judge should be able to say what a woman is, although it may be necessary for you and if that is the case, your need is unnecessary. The fact that my saying what a woman is, is necessary for you to judge whether or not a professional judge should be able to say what a woman is, is a delusion on your part. Ignorance is a source of delusion. A source of ignorance is scatter-brain-ness, which I’ve noticed in your case is a propensity to not only move towards insignificances, but to express a need that others also wander away hand-in-hand with you from the yellow brick road of pertinence in order to progress in dialogue timed to the gait of you demanding that an unfortunate other comply, which may be fine for your personal pursuit and may well lead to your insights, however, the path to those insights is for you to walk without Walker, because it yields no fruit for the topic at hand, which is, shouldn’t a professional judge who is being considered for The Supremes be able to judge whether or not a human being is a woman? *Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 12:41 pmIf you are MEANING or 'trying to' say and claim here; "Your mother", then 'you' OBVIOUSLY either did NOT know "my mother", or do NOT know what a 'woman' IS, EXACTLY.
So, are you ABLE to define what a 'woman' IS, EXACTLY?
If yes, then what, EXACTLY, IS a 'woman', to 'you', "walker"?
Talk about providing a great example of an ATTEMPT to just DEFLECT.Walker wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 2:26 pmThe answer to your question is: the point is that a professional judge, as a judge, cannot say what a woman is. Your need for me to say what a woman is, is not my need. Nor is your need for me to say what a woman is, needed by the judge, for her to say what a woman is. Your need for me to say to you what a woman is, and your unstated and perhaps unrequited need to express what a woman is, is not needed by the judge to say what a woman is. What I say about a woman, or what you say about a woman, is not necessary for me to judge whether or not a judge should be able to say what a woman is, although it may be necessary for you and if that is the case, your need is unnecessary. The fact that my saying what a woman is, is necessary for you to judge whether or not a professional judge should be able to say what a woman is, is a delusion on your part. Ignorance is a source of delusion. A source of ignorance is scatter-brain-ness, which I’ve noticed in your case is a propensity to not only move towards insignificances, but to express a need that others also wander away hand-in-hand with you from the yellow brick road of pertinence in order to progress in dialogue timed to the gait of you demanding that an unfortunate other comply, which may be fine for your personal pursuit and may well lead to your insights, however, the path to those insights is for you to walk without Walker, because it yields no fruit for the topic at hand, which is, shouldn’t a professional judge who is being considered for The Supremes be able to judge whether or not a human being is a woman? *Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 12:41 pmIf you are MEANING or 'trying to' say and claim here; "Your mother", then 'you' OBVIOUSLY either did NOT know "my mother", or do NOT know what a 'woman' IS, EXACTLY.
So, are you ABLE to define what a 'woman' IS, EXACTLY?
If yes, then what, EXACTLY, IS a 'woman', to 'you', "walker"?
You may quote me.
Eve's song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oY5_QXBD878
* i.e., Yo mamma.
No, that's not the point. The point has been explained.
Why don't you stop talking to random strangers on the internet as if they have been born without a brain, I'm fairly certain people know what a woman is...stop being such a weird ass freak.
ONCE AGAIN, further PROOF 'you' are NOT able to define what a 'woman' IS, EXACTLY, but are quite happy to JUDGE "others" who ALSO can NOT define what a 'woman' IS, EXACTLY.Walker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 03, 2022 10:39 amNo, that's not the point. The point has been explained.
Try reading for comprehension.
My personal views are none of your business. Your irrelevant demands don't change that.
The SCOTUS nominee's personal views on what a woman is, is my business. Your opinions and reasoning, such as it is, doesn't change that.
Notice, I don't give a hoot in hell what you think a woman is because, that's irrelevant.
Have a nice day.
