Question

[Eodnhoj7]

sure thing - question away




know your id (or is it ego?) - not sure via Frued(sp) lingo (he was a bit of a nutter in his sexual ideas - but concur with his views of the subconscious).

its a life long struggle (litterlly) - to understand one's subconscious.

damn near all fail - firstmost because of not being honest with oneself WRT to their conscious mind.

even if one his honest with oneself's conscious mind, they then have to strive to understand their subconsious.

the latter is a life long endever, the former is hard enough for most, the latter 10 times morso and not doable without the first step.

welcome more questioning.

What do you concur with with frued if your concurrence is due to a subjective nature you do not fully understand?

??don't understand your inquary.

welcome rewording/re-phrasing.

so i may reply to your question.

You claim one cannot understand the subjective experience, yet you concurring with Freud is a subjective experience, so how do you know you concur?

[gaffo]

What do you concur with with frued if your concurrence is due to a subjective nature you do not fully understand?

??don't understand your inquary.

welcome rewording/re-phrasing.

so i may reply to your question.

You claim one cannot understand the subjective experience, yet you concurring with Freud is a subjective experience, so how do you know you concur?

????????
my experience/understanding of "things" is subjective be nature.

me, myself and I.

I concur with Freud WRT to the subconscience .

not sure what you are stating and how i do not conform with said, but welcome disscussion on such matters.

fast reply BTW - impressive

lol.

lets converse!

[Eodnhoj7]

??don't understand your inquary.

welcome rewording/re-phrasing.

so i may reply to your question.

You claim one cannot understand the subjective experience, yet you concurring with Freud is a subjective experience, so how do you know you concur?

????????
my experience/understanding of "things" is subjective be nature.

me, myself and I.

I concur with Freud WRT to the subconscience .

not sure what you are stating and how i do not conform with said, but welcome disscussion on such matters.

fast reply BTW - impressive

lol.

lets converse!

How do you know you concur in the face of "me, myself and I"?

[gaffo]

You claim one cannot understand the subjective experience, yet you concurring with Freud is a subjective experience, so how do you know you concur?

????????
my experience/understanding of "things" is subjective be nature.

me, myself and I.

I concur with Freud WRT to the subconscience .

not sure what you are stating and how i do not conform with said, but welcome disscussion on such matters.

fast reply BTW - impressive

lol.

lets converse!

How do you know you concur in the face of "me, myself and I"?

oh, we we are discussing now?

good!

why this forum is and why i'm here!

I concur with Freud's ideas of the subconscience.

as for my subjectivity - that is self evident (Decarte was correct in his early days)

yes, I'm a Solipist - so my views are personal and subjective.

obviously.

---wow! even faster reply! (to myself?).

impressed.

thanks for reply of course.

[gaffo]

to answer you inquiry - be Freud as me or his own man - in agreement with his views concerning the subconscience.

[Eodnhoj7]

????????
my experience/understanding of "things" is subjective be nature.

me, myself and I.

I concur with Freud WRT to the subconscience .

not sure what you are stating and how i do not conform with said, but welcome disscussion on such matters.

fast reply BTW - impressive

lol.

lets converse!

How do you know you concur in the face of "me, myself and I"?

oh, we we are discussing now?

good!

why this forum is and why i'm here!

I concur with Freud's ideas of the subconscience.

as for my subjectivity - that is self evident (Decarte was correct in his early days)

yes, I'm a Solipist - so my views are personal and subjective.

obviously.

---wow! even faster reply! (to myself?).

impressed.

thanks for reply of course.

You never answered "why do you concur?"

[gaffo]

How do you know you concur in the face of "me, myself and I"?

oh, we we are discussing now?

good!

why this forum is and why i'm here!

I concur with Freud's ideas of the subconscience.

as for my subjectivity - that is self evident (Decarte was correct in his early days)

yes, I'm a Solipist - so my views are personal and subjective.

obviously.

---wow! even faster reply! (to myself?).

impressed.

thanks for reply of course.

You never answered "why do you concur?"

ok.

help me out, so that we my discuss/debate life and death.

[Eodnhoj7]

oh, we we are discussing now?

good!

why this forum is and why i'm here!

I concur with Freud's ideas of the subconscience.

as for my subjectivity - that is self evident (Decarte was correct in his early days)

yes, I'm a Solipist - so my views are personal and subjective.

obviously.

---wow! even faster reply! (to myself?).

impressed.

thanks for reply of course.

You never answered "why do you concur?"

ok.

help me out, so that we my discuss/debate life and death.

How does one concur, if concurrence is subjective and the subjective self is not known?

[Arising_uk]

...

I concur with Freud WRT to the subconscience . ...

What, that there isn't one?