Prejudiced lightning

General chit-chat

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Prejudiced lightning

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

Men are five times more likely to be struck by lightning than women (I believe this stat pertains to the US).

Why?

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
User avatar
QuantumT
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 7:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by QuantumT »

Perhaps because men are taller...? :shock:
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

QuantumT wrote: โ†‘Sat May 26, 2018 2:58 pm Perhaps because men are taller...? :shock:
The internet says it's because men are recreational, but I don't buy that explanation. At a game, you may have men on the field, but you have their wives and girlfriends in the stands e.g. out in the open. AccuWeather Channel on tv said the ratio is 5:1, the internet says the figure is 82% going back as far as 1968.

Again I ask why?

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Philosophy Explorer wrote: โ†‘Sat May 26, 2018 1:51 pm Men are five times more likely to be struck by lightning than women (I believe this stat pertains to the US).

Why?

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
Because we are made in the image of Odin and Zeus...the gods of lighting...jk.
User avatar
QuantumT
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 7:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by QuantumT »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: โ†‘Sat May 26, 2018 3:54 pm Because we are made in the image of Odin and Zeus...the gods of lighting...jk.
Odin?! WTF! Hasn't DC Comics taught you anything? :mrgreen:
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12314
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Arising_uk »

They play more Golf.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12314
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Arising_uk »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:The internet says it's because men are recreational, but I don't buy that explanation. At a game, you may have men on the field, but you have their wives and girlfriends in the stands e.g. out in the open. AccuWeather Channel on tv said the ratio is 5:1, the internet says the figure is 82% going back as far as 1968.

Again I ask why?

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
Did you stop to consider that recreational might mean more than playing in a stadium?
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

Arising_uk wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 7:00 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote:The internet says it's because men are recreational, but I don't buy that explanation. At a game, you may have men on the field, but you have their wives and girlfriends in the stands e.g. out in the open. AccuWeather Channel on tv said the ratio is 5:1, the internet says the figure is 82% going back as far as 1968.

Again I ask why?

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
Did you stop to consider that recreational might mean more than playing in a stadium?
Drug taking???

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12314
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Arising_uk »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
Drug taking???

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
No, that the reason you gave for not believing the explantion you goggled was based upon the false idea that the bulk of recreational sports played by men are done in stadiums with an audience of wives and girlfriends.
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

Arising_uk wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 7:15 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote:
Drug taking???

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
No, that the reason you gave for not believing the explantion you goggled was based upon the false idea that the bulk of recreational sports played by men are done in stadiums with an audience of wives and girlfriends.
Now that I understand what you mean, I've considered other possibilities. You still haven't given a possible explanation as to why men are far more likely to get struck by lightning.

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Philosophy Explorer wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 8:30 pm
Arising_uk wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 7:15 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote:
Drug taking???

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
No, that the reason you gave for not believing the explantion you goggled was based upon the false idea that the bulk of recreational sports played by men are done in stadiums with an audience of wives and girlfriends.
Now that I understand what you mean, I've considered other possibilities. You still haven't given a possible explanation as to why men are far more likely to get struck by lightning.

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
He did. He said 'golf'. It seems to me that waving a metal rod around might attract a passing bolt of lightning.
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 8:45 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 8:30 pm
Arising_uk wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 7:15 pm No, that the reason you gave for not believing the explantion you goggled was based upon the false idea that the bulk of recreational sports played by men are done in stadiums with an audience of wives and girlfriends.
Now that I understand what you mean, I've considered other possibilities. You still haven't given a possible explanation as to why men are far more likely to get struck by lightning.

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
He did. He said 'golf'. It seems to me that waving a metal rod around might attract a passing bolt of lightning.
I've seen both men's and women's tournaments. I thought she was joking. In any case, there's much more outdoor activities than golf. For example shopping (which I believe women do more of than men).

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
User avatar
Noax
Posts: 672
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 3:25 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Noax »

Arising_uk wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 7:15 pm was based upon the false idea that the bulk of recreational sports played by men are done in stadiums with an audience of wives and girlfriends
In stormy weather no less.
Lost count of how many players I've seen lost to lightning that way, leaving the widow behind sitting on their metal bleachers...

Fishing comes to mind. Best fishing is done in the rain. Aluminum row boat added to casting wet conductive lines to the sky.
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

Noax wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 8:59 pm
Arising_uk wrote: โ†‘Sun May 27, 2018 7:15 pm was based upon the false idea that the bulk of recreational sports played by men are done in stadiums with an audience of wives and girlfriends
In stormy weather no less.
Lost count of how many players I've seen lost to lightning that way, leaving the widow behind sitting on their metal bleachers...
Wouldn't metal bleachers attract lightning and fricasee the women and children too?

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12314
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Prejudiced lightning

Post by Arising_uk »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Now that I understand what you mean, I've considered other possibilities. You still haven't given a possible explanation as to why men are far more likely to get struck by lightning.

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธPhilX๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
Because in the US they're five times more likely to be out and about in their recreational pursuits? As I'm pretty sure the stat doesn't mean that if you put a man and a women together in a lightning storm a man is more likely to be hit by lightning than a women but if he is then in this situation I'd look to height as being an answer but if they lay-down - which is the recommended course of action if caught in a lightning storm - I'd make the oddds even.
Post Reply