You're a birdbrain as you like to twist words.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Tue May 29, 2018 6:15 pmWhen will 'Yanks' like you learn to stop using "ad hominem" until you understand what it means?Philosophy Explorer wrote:Arising posted this ad hom: …
An ad hominem would have been "PhilEx is mental so his argument is invalid". What I said is more towards an insult "You are mental because your argument is a complete misunderstanding of the facts of Physics" but in fact I was asking a question "Are you mental? As your argument is based upon a complete misunderstanding of the facts of Physics."Thanks for proving you are mental, as you have actually proved my point that lightning would hit buildings and not shoppers.You don't know what you're talking about. I was shopping by a mall when a thunderstorm struck (I stayed inside). The storm struck a McDonalds across the street, which was near taller office buildings, setting it on fire. Those lightning rods did McDonalds a world of good, didn't they Arising? …You prove the old adage "A sense of humour in Britain is obligatory, in the US its optional."Oh, and those women allegedly having more sense than the men shows how desperate you are in trying to win an argument and how prejudiced you are towards men as you can't find a study to support your pathetic argument. …There is no argument numbnuts!! There's just you not understanding statistics and how they apply to the world.You lost this argument Arising.
PhilX
PhilX