Page 1 of 1
Valintines
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:47 pm
by commonsense
Is it better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all?
Re: Valintines
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:38 pm
by -1-
commonsense wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:47 pm
Is it better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all?
I just jerk off myself... it's not too bad.
Re: Valintines
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:01 pm
by thedoc
commonsense wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:47 pm
Is it better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all?
How empty must life have been, to never have Loved another person.
Re: Valintines
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:06 pm
by GreatandWiseTrixie
thedoc wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:01 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:47 pm
Is it better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all?
How empty must life have been, to never have Loved another person.
empty of pain, but also empty of gain.
Re: Valintines
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:20 am
by ihoardpoetry
I think perhaps love and loss are two sides of the same coin, each providing mean to the other. We can appreciate love much more in the awareness of loss (absence makes the heart grow fonder) and the reason we experience loss is precisely because we felt such love. Personally, I'd rather have loved and lost. But, maybe that's the naive, wavering youth in me 
Re: Valintines
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:28 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
You could have at least goggled the spelling first.
Re: Valintines
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:33 pm
by Science Fan
How could anyone know? If a person did go through a situation where they lost a lover, then they would not have experienced the situation of never having loved at all. On the other hand, if they had never fallen in love, then how would they be able to compare their situation to one where they would have loved and lost?