Re: Is Bob Evenson an American Traitor?
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:54 pm
Please, quit talking like the fool you have established yourself to be.
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
That's right. You have a monopoly on foolishness in this area.bobevenson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:54 pm Please, quit talking like the fool you have established yourself to be.
May I suggest you save yourself the money and set up headquarters in Puerto Rico. The territory has gone bankrupt and they voted to become the 51st state so we won't miss them and you.bobevenson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:07 pmYou seem to have a short memory, as I stated earlier that my modus operandi of using the Champagne Sherry Principle is subsequent to a university study selecting the best city in the best county of the best state to establish AEP headquarters and begin political operations. Also, the AEP would give the federal government sufficient time to make reasonable progress toward a proper government envisioned by the AEP. By the way, I believe Walter Williams is a far better historian than you.Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:06 pm This is my response to Bob:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/ ... ion-legal/
Btw traitorous Bob, you never mentioned which state nor territory you propose to have seceding from "the Union." So it took you over a week to come up with this garbage thread. You don't even offer any reasons why you want to tear the Union apart and this makes you worse than Trump. So I say you can take your AEP and go stuff it because it will not be accepted by the US.
PhilX
PS Walter Williams is an economist, NOT a historian nor a legal expert.
If you permit me VT, let me add on to clarify. First Bob admitted that the AEP only exists in that feeble mind of his. Furthermore he's a thief as he's stealing from the American Electric Power (and at least five others who use that acronym) so he doesn't have a leg to stand on (and would be forced to change the name).vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:52 pmJust like your 'party'.bobevenson wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:51 pm Please, you should certainly know by now that the study hasn't started yet, but I did edit my reply as shown above.
Not traitorous at all. It was the British that were traitorous towards the colonies ("taxation without representation") to help pay for an expensive war the British had conducted. Furthermore you had a whole ocean of separation that hampered proper governance of the colonies and kept the British from looking upon the colonists as being full-fledged members of the Empire. So the British abrogated their responsibilities towards the colonies (it's interesting to note here that England has a long history of conducting war for various reasons against other countries). My final point is that you've dredged up history that isn't particularly relevant in these current times.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:10 am Didn't you have a war to get rid of English imperial rule? How traitorous of you.
I hold a doubt on your gender when you talk that way.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:17 am True. The greatest shit-stirring kunt on the planet.
You never were my prostitute.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:22 am Puritanical yank moron. Did your prostitute just leave?
Where did you copy-paste that from?Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:45 amNot traitorous at all. It was the British that were traitorous towards the colonies ("taxation without representation") to help pay for an expensive war the British had conducted. Furthermore you had a whole ocean of separation that hampered proper governance of the colonies and kept the British from looking upon the colonists as being full-fledged members of the Empire. So the British abrogated their responsibilities towards the colonies (it's interesting to note here that England has a long history of conducting war for various reasons against other countries). My final point is that you've dredged up history that isn't particularly relevant in these current times.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:10 am Didn't you have a war to get rid of English imperial rule? How traitorous of you.
The USA is still the greatest country on Earth (weren't we the first to land a man on the moon e.g.?)
PhilX
My own words.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:24 amWhere did you copy-paste that from?Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:45 amNot traitorous at all. It was the British that were traitorous towards the colonies ("taxation without representation") to help pay for an expensive war the British had conducted. Furthermore you had a whole ocean of separation that hampered proper governance of the colonies and kept the British from looking upon the colonists as being full-fledged members of the Empire. So the British abrogated their responsibilities towards the colonies (it's interesting to note here that England has a long history of conducting war for various reasons against other countries). My final point is that you've dredged up history that isn't particularly relevant in these current times.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:10 am Didn't you have a war to get rid of English imperial rule? How traitorous of you.
The USA is still the greatest country on Earth (weren't we the first to land a man on the moon e.g.?)
PhilX
Sure. Americans don't know that 'toward' is supposed to have an s on the end. Well if Bob's a 'traitor' then at least he has something going for him.Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:29 amMy own words.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:24 amWhere did you copy-paste that from?Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:45 am
Not traitorous at all. It was the British that were traitorous towards the colonies ("taxation without representation") to help pay for an expensive war the British had conducted. Furthermore you had a whole ocean of separation that hampered proper governance of the colonies and kept the British from looking upon the colonists as being full-fledged members of the Empire. So the British abrogated their responsibilities towards the colonies (it's interesting to note here that England has a long history of conducting war for various reasons against other countries). My final point is that you've dredged up history that isn't particularly relevant in these current times.
The USA is still the greatest country on Earth (weren't we the first to land a man on the moon e.g.?)
PhilX
PhilX
You do worse in your attitude and knowledge. Still practicing your American discrimination. You will never grow up and learn.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2017 10:58 amSure. Americans don't know that 'toward' is supposed to have an s on the end.