powell's kraken?

General chit-chat

Moderators: AMod, iMod

FlashDangerpants
Posts: 2912
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 5:02 pm no bets were or are hedged
When you posted this trhead with nothing but a bare link to legal filing, where you endorsing Sydney Powell's action, or weere you merely putting the information out there without commitment?

When you refer to all the Antifa people who were supposedly inflitrating the oafish legion that assaulted your parliament, you wrote "(legit trumpers or antifa masqueraders)" to hedge your bets.

I've seen you refer to folks believing rightly or wrongly that the election was fraudulent. But I haven't noticed you actually writing that it was fraudulent.

You never hedged your bets that way when you were telling us that Covid is less than a cold and would be forgotten by April last year. Or when you tell us that global warming is a communist myth.
Walker
Posts: 8517
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 5:02 pm anyway: not gonna indulge you, not today
It’s like indulging this style of discussion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI-xOCwkEC8
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 10425
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by henry quirk »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Sun Jan 17, 2021 1:44 am
henry quirk wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 5:02 pm no bets were or are hedged
When you posted this trhead with nothing but a bare link to legal filing, where you endorsing Sydney Powell's action, or weere you merely putting the information out there without commitment?

When you refer to all the Antifa people who were supposedly inflitrating the oafish legion that assaulted your parliament, you wrote "(legit trumpers or antifa masqueraders)" to hedge your bets.

I've seen you refer to folks believing rightly or wrongly that the election was fraudulent. But I haven't noticed you actually writing that it was fraudulent.

You never hedged your bets that way when you were telling us that Covid is less than a cold and would be forgotten by April last year. Or when you tell us that global warming is a communist myth.
as I say: you're spoilin' for a fight

as I say: I'm not inclined to indulge you

ain't nuthin' in it for me
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 2912
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Sidney Powell Tells Judge ‘No Reasonable Person’ Would Believe Her Dominion Conspiracy Theories Were ‘Statements of Fact’
Facing more than $1.3 billion in liabilities over her post-election conspiracy theories, lawyer Sidney Powell told a judge that the defamation lawsuit Dominion Voting Systems filed against her earlier this year should be dismissed because “no reasonable person” would believe that her well-publicized comments about an international plot against former President Donald Trump were “statements of fact.”
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/s ... ostpopular

You guys were total fools for getting roped into such weirdo conspiracist bullshit, and now the bullshitter wants to distance herself from the fuckwits that bought it. Still lapping it up anyway Walker, or is it time to pretend you were never into that silliness?
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 10425
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by henry quirk »

Official Statement from Sidney’s Lawyer

HOWARD KLEINHENDLER, ATTORNEY FOR SIDNEY POWELL, RESPONDS TO MEDIA ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING MOTION TO DISMISS FILED AGAINST DOMINION COMPLAINT

New York, New York March 23, 2021

Yesterday, several news media outlets cut and paste out of context portions of our motion to dismiss the Dominion complaint to “spin” a message that the election fraud allegations that Ms. Powell presented to various courts and to the public were not credible. I’d like to clarify what actually was presented to the court. First, let me be clear: any suggestion that “no reasonable person” would believe Ms. Powell or her comments on the election is false. The language these reports referred to is a legal standard adopted by the courts to determine whether statements qualify as opinions which are exempt from defamation liability.

As the DC Circuit reaffirmed just last week, there is no claim for defamation when the alleged “defamatory” statement is a legal opinion. Ms. Powell’s statements fall precisely into this category. Ms. Powell reviewed sworn affidavits, declarations, expert testimony, and other highly corroborated evidence concerning the election which Ms. Powell filed with the courts and shared publicly. She continues to stand by those opinions today. Our motion, in part, argues that the Dominion case should be dismissed because legal opinions are not grounds for defamation.

In sum, the legal standard of a technical legal defense crafted by the courts has been improperly manipulated by the media to tell a false narrative. Ms. Powell is not backing down or retracting her previous statements concerning Dominion. Dominion’s case lacks legal merit and should be dismissed in its entirety.

For further information contact (917) 793-1188
Walker
Posts: 8517
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

Eager minions are easily blinded by headlines, which is understandable, since they are impervious to thinking.

:lol:

Obviously, Powell is pinned between survival and bankruptcy.

The little bit of investigation that was done into Dominion indicates fraud.

Interesting that the minions eagerly justify Dominion vs. Powell, but all challenges to the election didn't even get heard by the courts.

And just look at the results. Look at who the president is now. Can't hide the evidence of that, but minions believe what they're told in the headlines, they have been conditioned to not believe their lying eyes.

So far, no one has admitted to voting for Biden The Corrupt, which is odd, considering that we're told he's the most popular president in the history of the country, by far.




Here's What Was Discovered About Dominion Machines Used in a Swing State
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbauma ... e-n2581624

"We found that the Dominion Voting Systems is designed intentionally to create inherent and systemic voting errors. What I mean by that is when you run a ballot through the machine, even if it's a blank ballot, it will have a 68 percent chance of creating an error," DePerno told reporter John Solomon. "When you create an error, this machine does not reject the ballot. What it does instead is send it to a folder and that folder will then accumulate the ballots until the time that someone decides that they need those ballots. And then those ballots will be bulk adjudicated by someone. Could be offsite, could be onsite somewhere sitting at a computer. And, without any oversight, they can click one button, lope the entire batch of ballots to one candidate and then send them back to the tabulator."
Walker
Posts: 8517
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

Isn't it odd that "glitches," recounts, and every so called "mistake" by the press ...

All went in favor of the Democrats.

Don't even think about it.

:lol:
Walker
Posts: 8517
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by Walker »

You guys were total fools for getting roped into such weirdo conspiracist bullshit, and now the bullshitter wants to distance herself from the fuckwits that bought it. Still lapping it up anyway Walker, or is it time to pretend you were never into that silliness?
What a disgusting person.

Gives philosophy a bad name.
mickthinks
Posts: 895
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
Location: Augsburg

Re: powell's kraken?

Post by mickthinks »

The little bit of investigation that was done into Dominion indicates fraud.
No, it doesn't.

All went in favor of the Democrats.
No, they didn't.

What a disgusting person.
Every accusation a subconscious confession ...
Post Reply