a new definition of knowledge

Known unknowns and unknown unknowns!

Moderators: AMod, iMod

popeye1945
Posts: 2151
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: a new definition of knowledge

Post by popeye1945 »

Iwannaplato.

No experience is knowledge, true it is temporal in the sense that judgment is to follow but at the moment it is knowledge truth, unquestioned until judgment arises. If there is nothing to trigger judgment it is pure knowledge, read pure truth to the individual organism.
jayjacobus
Posts: 1273
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:45 pm

Re: a new definition of knowledge

Post by jayjacobus »

Iwannaplato wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 7:43 am
jayjacobus wrote: Wed May 25, 2022 8:22 pm Knowledge can be contradictory and is many times only conjecture.
I assume you mean what is taken to be knowledge.
Knowledge requires understanding. Misunderstanding precludes knowledge.
trokanmariel
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:35 am

Re: a new definition of knowledge

Post by trokanmariel »

Seeing through the uniformity. It's a seeing-through-the-contrasts-of-public psychology character, provided by OCD, the OCD character being Samantha Pufl.

OCD then. It's a suspension developer, in which the developer is free to be consciously deactivated from the suspension world itself, with no harm coming to the world.

The purpose, of the sharing of the OCD-seeing-through-the-contrasts-of-public psychology character:
It's the creation, embodied by Pufl, of the Anti being able to move towards the Mature Anti, in which the Mature Anti consists of militarism, university, business, dating and exorcisms.

Who can be a user, of this creation?
On the surface, it can be the creator of the idea existence (days being ideology, Brittney Havers being the philosophy atom's creator, travel existing within planets, cinema using days, in order for cinema to exit story from the brain etc), consisting of the geographical matter using the lengths, heights and widths of idea: Brittney Havers-Thomas Heath
popeye1945
Posts: 2151
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: a new definition of knowledge

Post by popeye1945 »

A new definition of knowledge would be, a knowing of the world through the changing it makes to the biology of the body, processed by conscious understanding.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 6802
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: a new definition of knowledge

Post by Iwannaplato »

jayjacobus wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 8:25 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 7:43 am
jayjacobus wrote: Wed May 25, 2022 8:22 pm Knowledge can be contradictory and is many times only conjecture.
I assume you mean what is taken to be knowledge.
Knowledge requires understanding. Misunderstanding precludes knowledge.
I was reacting to the idea that knowledge is many times only conjecture. Was it knowledge if it is conjecture? Or is someone confusing conjecture with knowledge?
popeye1945
Posts: 2151
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: a new definition of knowledge

Post by popeye1945 »

Conjecture is an unsubstantiated claim but in the first person there is self-substantiation, conjecture is for communication, for the individual it remains that experience is truth whether in the negative or the positive.
Post Reply