the resolution of truth

Known unknowns and unknown unknowns!

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Advocate
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

the resolution of truth

Post by Advocate »

An understanding that accounts for too few details is indistinguishable from one that is just wrong.
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: the resolution of truth

Post by popeye1945 »

Advocate wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 4:26 pm An understanding that accounts for too few details is indistinguishable from one that is just wrong.
An understanding is true to the biology that defines it. All meaning is the experience of biology, change the biology and you change the experience/knowledge/truth. The truth might not always agree with the conditions of the outer world but it is always true to the biology that experiences it. Therefore the process is not infallible and the same biology that errored cannot experience its error and must rely upon the biology of the group experience for correction. An understanding with not enough details would not be understood, not be an experience.
trokanmariel
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:35 am

Re: the resolution of truth

Post by trokanmariel »

The modernity using classic access, to all images of existence as rearrangement force depending on the trajectory of nationalism/modernity from history apparatus (a Frank Slade good word access), is an obvious resolution of truth; however, its particulars need to be pronounced

Sociology possession's theology needs the macro data puzzle using the theology discussion/philosophy discussion (this means the practice of perhaps physics waiting to consume the personality individuality), for the purpose of sociology theology being able to not expose its fear of personality individuality (Mary Heath) being a controller of the macro society construct (Americanism), is one particular. Another particular, is the alliance between extraction to text from meta physics and text being a free movement without observation of it (a Lia Haddock reference, from Limetown), along the identity of the pendulum story across the aristocracies of sociology theology being able to not expose its fear of personality individuality (Mary Heath) being a controller of the macro society construct (Americanism).

After the pronouncement, of the particulars, there is the extraction of ideas from written text's (a Megan Fox possession, from the kitchen of JB) absence as capitalist (a reference to the ingenuity/inspiration compartmentalisation - a Nick Fury reference - over the principle that following left-wing transcendence's news media use as self-means, the outer space dimensions declare their exposure of disparity as absence) machine.
Now, what is the constitution, of the machine of the absence as capitalist written text?

The inclusion of idea, within the constitution, is the inference spirituality of shapelessness (a Bruce Lee reference); next, the inclusion of absence itself is the meaning of darkness coming forward. Next, the capitalist written text is the reception horror of the following . .


The comfy combinations of through, a meaning of sociology's units (covered in physics colours) being able to travel together.
The exemption by daylight, of the aristocracy's storytelling through days mechanism, being a cultural problem of absence to intervention identity construct toward the philosophy units of the aristocracy's storytelling through days mechanism having to work with the physics units of absence to intervention, because of the aforementioned macro data puzzle waiting to use user of theology discussion meaning the creation of the split of human anatomy via exposure/speech of left-wing transcendence


The extraction of ideas analysis, subsequent to the pronouncement: it was perhaps a theme mirror as visual word metaphor to the particulars listing.

To focus, now, on the latest development:
the split, and its possible protection as not just means meaning (a Nadia Bjorlin-Racer Drive reference) by the Big Bang. Of course, the reference here is atoms.
Typically, atoms are a theme awareness of aristocracy effect. They don't invite the relay brilliance of daylight, for example. Which reminds me . .

Emotion ingenuity's bias, to (Robert Shaw is listening) images of supermarket use, because of the helpful alliance of privacy between physics keeping up with the metaphor (an antithesis theme structure, to supermarket use) and Heaven's deceased are computers (a Rose McIver/Bailey De Young reference), is a rival system to the fourway alliance between left-wing transcendence, gravitation to body glamour, writing is from sex (a James Boo edit) and visual word power all concocting themselves (and their alliance) into being a nothing to attract towards machine (an Arnold Schwarzenegger -Terminator 3 reference, with nick Stahl and Claire Danes).


The left-wing transcendence, gravitation to body glamour, writing is from sex and visual word power reliance for left-wing transcendence (the meaning of the concept being (Tom Hanks' Scott Turner's reference, with Hooch, Reginald Veljohnson, John McIntire and JC Quinn and Mare Winningham) to perhaps help the sunlight condition of retaining the humour of biology's inevitability formula of behaviour equals evil, as a visual word identity matter's observation over the computation network of days), has systematically of course been a creator of past posts, as a reliance for other dimensions.








For Chris O'Donnell
Post Reply