Identity is grounded in both equivocation and non-equivocation where "identity" itself is grounded in "relations" in which one axiom exists as fundamentally a ratio.
A exists as B and C; hence b and c are a ratio.
For example "horse" exists as the ratio of the axioms "mammal", "herbivore" and "x" (with "x" observing other definitions).
Horse = mammal, herbivore, "x"
observes equivocation where the horse is the connection of axioms as a static unchanging role.
It also observe equivocation where the horse is a boundary of change where it progresses from one axiom to another.
Equivocation as undefined takes on a dynamic role in "P=P"
Equivocation as defined takes on a static role in =P=.
Equivocation, as well as the variable, in which both exist through eachother observe function as form (or "proof" as "function" where the "proof" effectively is a "form"): "P=".
The axiom of "excluded middle" observes divergent properties.
The axiom "inherent middle" (as an oppositve of "excluded middle" where the "excluded" middle either exists or does not exist" observes convergent properties.
"Excluded Middle" and "Inherent Middle" as both divergence and convergence observes all axioms as synthetic in nature.
Excluded Middle, Inherent Middle, Identity as Synthetic
-
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Excluded Middle, Inherent Middle, Identity as Synthetic
excluded middle - donut
inherent middle - jelly filled
dunking identity...
-Imp
inherent middle - jelly filled
dunking identity...
-Imp