PE stated,Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:59 pmSo, are you prescribing to the idea that there's one true color, and it's a problem if we don't all see that?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:06 am Therefore it it critical in this case we must research to find out the detail neural mechanics of such color blindness. Once we have done that [with advance neurosciences] then we can prevent the problem of color blindness in both you and me, where we will always see the same color even when the object changes color.
I don't think that's true. It could just be the expansive nature of our exploration and progress as humans.
"My OP implies that the wavelength is the same"
My reply is based that.
That is possible but that is restricted to a small minority. For example one may convert to be 'theistic' to marry his girlfriend or other reasons thus their belief is pseudo. A person born into a religion may be labelled 'religious' by mere birth.I don't know about that. I think there are theists who don't actually believe in what they're doing/saying, but they have their individual reasons for following that particular social pattern -- just like any patterns that people may adopt in life.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:06 amThe above example can be applied to theists who believe in God and non-theists who don't.
Both stances are due to mental states which are supported by its respective neural connectivity in the brain.
I see it like wearing clothes and performing a role on the stage of life. What will you be? A king? A beggar? A theist? A politician? A free spirit? Does it matter? Will there be negative consequences in each case? Very likely.
But when a person is triggered to be genuinely religious, that is represented by a certain pattern of neural connectivity.