The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Known unknowns and unknown unknowns!

Moderators: AMod, iMod

TimeSeeker
Posts: 2866
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:42 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by TimeSeeker »

I have a far simpler description of a "limits".

Categories. Aspects. Taxonomies. Perspectives. Language. All the constructs/tools we, humans, have invented.

The universe has none of those properties. They are all properties of minds.
If our small minds, for some convenience, divide this glass of wine, this universe, into parts — physics, biology, geology, astronomy, psychology, and so on — remember that nature does not know it! --Richard Feynman
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

TimeSeeker wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:52 pm I have a far simpler description of a "limits".

Categories. Aspects. Taxonomies. Perspectives. Language. All the constructs/tools we, humans, have invented.

The universe has none of those properties. They are all properties of minds.
If our small minds, for some convenience, divide this glass of wine, this universe, into parts — physics, biology, geology, astronomy, psychology, and so on — remember that nature does not know it! --Richard Feynman
These "Categories, Aspects, Taxonomies, Perspectives, Language" as constructs stem from the application of directional qualities where one definition is not just defined in the respect it is directed to another (or even sub-definitions) but exist through the limits of the line because of this directional quality.

In these respects the connective quality of "construction" observes a dual element of seperation as what is connected effectively must be seperate at another point in time through time, with this seperation and connection being qualities of intelligence stemming from the limit of the line both abstractly and physically with abstraction and physicality observing these same linear quality of limit as both definitions are connected and seperated from eachother while individually existing through the directional properties of the line.

In these respects all definition as intelligence occurs through the limit of the line with intelligence fundamentally stemming from it and effectively because of its connection existing through it.

In these respects, from the premise of the line, "The All is Mind".
TimeSeeker
Posts: 2866
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:42 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by TimeSeeker »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 9:33 pm These "Categories, Aspects, Taxonomies, Perspectives, Language" as constructs stem from the application of directional qualities where one definition is not just defined in the respect it is directed to another (or even sub-definitions) but exist through the limits of the line because of this directional quality.
No. It's far simpler than that. Psychology.

Our mind can't grasp complexity. The world has no categories - try grasp that. No humans, no cars, no Earth. It's all one - all is one. Yea.... doesn't work ;)

Taxonomies are tools. They help you manage complexity. Because you are after all (pre-selected) by evolution for Survival. Those who didn't have taxonomies are now extinct ;)
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

TimeSeeker wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 9:39 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 9:33 pm These "Categories, Aspects, Taxonomies, Perspectives, Language" as constructs stem from the application of directional qualities where one definition is not just defined in the respect it is directed to another (or even sub-definitions) but exist through the limits of the line because of this directional quality.
No. It's far simpler than that. Psychology.

Our mind can't grasp complexity. The world has no categories - try grasp that. No humans, no cars, no Earth. It's all one - all is one. Yea.... doesn't work ;)

Taxonomies are tools. They help you manage complexity. Because you are after all (pre-selected) by evolution for Survival. Those who didn't have taxonomies are now extinct ;)
And all psychology exists as the application of limits stemming from the directive qualities of the line.
TimeSeeker
Posts: 2866
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:42 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by TimeSeeker »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 9:49 pm And all psychology exists as the application of limits stemming from the directive qualities of the line.
Which line? Show me a line. Take a photo of one ;)

Point me to this line using something other than words!
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

TimeSeeker wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:03 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 9:49 pm And all psychology exists as the application of limits stemming from the directive qualities of the line.
Which line? Show me a line. Take a photo of one ;)

Point me to this line using something other than words!
The linear directive quality of the sentence gives precedence to the understanding of the sentence itself.

It also gives precedence to the formation of the words from letters.

And from letters, the actual symbolic form of the letter, and the corresponding frequencies which form the sounds.

All stemming from a single point...with the point being the axiom as the point is fully self-evident and subject to both a nature of quality and quantity while composing both quality and quantity as extensions of the point. The "point" as origin, synonymous and connected to the "axiom" as origin of intellect, effectively observes an inherent quality of reason due to is capacity of and for "measurement" where it provides a base foundation to the universal practical application of and abstract methodology of unity and multiplicity, where unity and multiplicity observes a foundation of all phenomenon through measurement.



The act of psychology, the study of the mind or soul depending on the definitions (which are inherently connected regardless), observes an inherent projective and receptive capacity where the patient or doctor alternate the projection and reception of thoughts as a form of pscyho-surgery where a group of thoughts (as the respective axioms of the patient or doctor) effectively penetrate the other forming new axioms from which the patient and doctor make corresponding changes (the patient is cured, the doctor evolves treatment). All of this is premised in the directive nature of the thought where the axioms of the respective parties effectively exist as limits which connect or separate the axioms which compose the inherent perspectives and realities of the individuals and contain a literal (through notes, diagrams) and intuitive property of linearism which gives further premise to the intellect being composed of, existing through, and composing limits as the "line".

This linear property of the intellect stems to the age old philosophical property of whether geometry has premise in physical or abstract realities and considering:

1) The abstract and physical are both connected and separated through limits.

2) The physical and abstract respectively being composed of limits.

3) The limit as both physical (through the 5 senses) and abstract (through the 2 senses of intuition and reason).

It can be observed that all physical and abstract limits are mediated through limit itself, and hence are not seperable except from a perspective of relative parts...but this in itself is subject to contradiction as a deficiency in understanding.
TimeSeeker
Posts: 2866
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:42 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by TimeSeeker »

Still not following.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

TimeSeeker wrote: Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:24 pm Still not following.
All definition occurs through relation of parts where a part is merely a division of a whole. One definition is a part of a larger definition with this definition existing if and only if it is relative to another definition with this relation occurring if and only if it is directed to another definition.

We observe this in linear reasoning where the continuity of axioms occurs through a connective process with this connective process observing one axiom being directed towards another.

Because of the directional nature of axioms being 1 dimensional (1 directional) they are premised literally and intuitively through the line.
TimeSeeker
Posts: 2866
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:42 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by TimeSeeker »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:51 pm
TimeSeeker wrote: Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:24 pm Still not following.
All definition occurs through relation of parts where a part is merely a division of a whole. One definition is a part of a larger definition with this definition existing if and only if it is relative to another definition with this relation occurring if and only if it is directed to another definition.

We observe this in linear reasoning where the continuity of axioms occurs through a connective process with this connective process observing one axiom being directed towards another.

Because of the directional nature of axioms being 1 dimensional (1 directional) they are premised literally and intuitively through the line.
Are you perhaps talking about Semiotics? http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Docum ... sem02.html

And the relationships (definitions) of the signifiers in respect to one another?
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

TimeSeeker wrote: Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:57 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:51 pm
TimeSeeker wrote: Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:24 pm Still not following.
All definition occurs through relation of parts where a part is merely a division of a whole. One definition is a part of a larger definition with this definition existing if and only if it is relative to another definition with this relation occurring if and only if it is directed to another definition.

We observe this in linear reasoning where the continuity of axioms occurs through a connective process with this connective process observing one axiom being directed towards another.

Because of the directional nature of axioms being 1 dimensional (1 directional) they are premised literally and intuitively through the line.
Are you perhaps talking about Semiotics? http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Docum ... sem02.html

And the relationships (definitions) of the signifiers in respect to one another?
Partially...we are still left with the philosophical problem that reasoning is premised intuitively and literally (the form and function of statements) in geometric forms.
TimeSeeker
Posts: 2866
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:42 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by TimeSeeker »

“Philosophical problem” sounds like an oxymoron. Philosophy doesn’t solve problems - it creates them.

I don’t understand what ‘problem’ you are pointing at; and what you would seem to be an acceptable solution to it.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

TimeSeeker wrote: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:49 am “Philosophical problem” sounds like an oxymoron. Philosophy doesn’t solve problems - it creates them.

I don’t understand what ‘problem’ you are pointing at; and what you would seem to be an acceptable solution to it.
"The All" through Limit as the Premise of Philosophical Speculation

The problem of philosophy is its relativistic multiplicity expressed through a myriad of schools and perspectives which effectively branch from one another through a continual set of dualisms where one school results in an antithetical dual school (such as the the schools of Parmenides and Democritus/Leucippus or more recently Neitzche and Keikegaard; however these examples continue and will continue ad-infinitum).

The multiplicity of schools, and there inherent branching of one from another, inevitably leads to a question of common bond or foundation from which these schools must logically source themselves from and through. This multiplicity is not just limited strictly to philosophical schools themselves but effectively extensions of the schools through the various sciences for a variety of reasons.

Biologists have no conception of what leads into mathematics nor do the mathematicians understand what leads to biology. Chemists do not fully understand the relation of chemicals and sound, nor does the study of harmonics give premise to the function of chemicals. The examples can continue on and on, however the common means is a focal axiom which acts as a point of inversion lead to further axioms which are both connected points in themselves or are directed from one to another under a continuous cycle of alternation where chemistry may lead to biology with biology leading back to chemistry causing the ever expanding circle of biochemistry.

This degree of relation is not just limited to philosophical schools and the empirical sciences but effectively religion itself in various forms and manners where judaism leads to christianity leading further to islam with various subbranches synthesizing into Chrislam or Various Jewish-Christian Sects. This can be observed further in Eastern Religions with Hinduism, Buddhism, and Daoism. However this branching and synthetic aspect alone is not limited to anyone of these religions.

At the practical level we can observe this branching effect within the elements of nature itself, regardless of its biological or non-biological nature, extending to various elements of the human constitution embodied through the various perspectives or psychologies which constitute the human condition with this condition of reality and the human experience further embodied under the act of definition or classification mediate through the reflective nature of the human experience itself.

Philosophy, Science, Religion and Practical Empirical Experience further observe this branching and cycling where one is simultaneously directed to another axiom of being, and hence connected through a process of cycling between these points of measurement, resulting in the branching of axioms where subjectivity and objectivity observe a further connection and cycling.

Under these premises, we can observe an focal beginning point of measurement as to the nature of reality (philosophy, religion, science, practical reality) beginning with the subjective objective nature of the axiom as a point of measurement in itself or "limit".

Now the question of source leads not just to a specific origin in time but effectively an ever present medium where a strict point of origin does not necessarily limit itself to a specific focal point in time under the common conception of beginning but rather points to an inherent element effectively observed within all these philosophies from relativistically different degrees of not just awareness but in more practical and objective terms angles of measurement.

The common bond, we must necessarily infer from the inherent branching of these schools into further schools and the cycling of interwoven arguments each school projects against or for another school gives a basic necessary element of "limit" as a unifying foundation where the schools exist because of an inherent directive capacity of change from one form into another with this interconnectivity of through relativistic change necessitating a premise of "The All" as an origin point of truth made manifest through the directive nature of the form and function through which these schools exist as extensions of eachother.

"The All" as the premise for both the foundation of the school and the respective schools reflective awareness gives premise to "The All" as a limit in itself through its inherent nature of directive limits which give the very form of the school of and through eachother where this multifaceted linear branching effect, and the connective cycling of arguments within and between the schools themselves, observes each school as a specific axiom of awareness as a focal point of awareness which gives premise to further schools.

The question of the correct unifying premise of philosophy is evident within the problem of the many schools themselves, which dennotes itself not so much as a problem upon closer inspection but an inherent nature that extends within each school and through each school. This unifying premise can be observed in the basic directive qualities of the schools existing through further schools with these directive qualities giving form and function to the schools in these respects.

From a perspective of "The All" as a unified premise, limit must be the foundation of a new Philosophy.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

TimeSeeker wrote: Tue Sep 11, 2018 4:43 pm How do you address tackle the symbol-grounding problem and problems of reduction when it comes to asserting the truthfulness of your pre-suppositions?
The basic premise of all symbol is that the symbol exists as a composition of limits which the symbol as a composition of limits being directed to further symbols as a composition of limits itself (forming an image through a word/sentence, picture, physical entity, etc.).

The base foundation of the symbol is premised in its directive capacity with this directive capacity existing as a limit in itself, with the primary trifold lines of the point line and circle as 3 in 1 and 1 in 3 being the foundation of all limits.

Under these terms the symbols can be observe as existing in both form and function of these limits (which we observe in the point, line and circle) with a theoretical universal language being founded in geometry as having both inherent qualitative and quantitative properties.

It is logically inevitable that the most universal alphabet would be premised in geometric symbols of various sorts and properties observing inhernent directional qualities.

The Mirror Function thread in the mathematics section equates all number as 1 dimensional points and negative dimensional lines which exist inseperable from their arithmetic functions (all addition as positive numbers, all subtraction as negative numbers, with the repitition of addition leading to multiplication and powers and the repetitition of subtraction leading to division and root) where arithmetic itself (and logic as an extension of it considering the premise everthing is connected) being premised in directive qualities observes through the symbols of the line point and circle and the approximates of it (further evidence in the mirror function thread).
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The 13 Prime Directive Laws of Reason (original/incomplete)

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Update: Consolidated to 9



The question of the true nature of not just being, but philosophy itself, stems from a problem of foundation where the foundation determines the structure which stems forth and gives meaning to the activity of reasoning.

Below are 13 Prime Directives of Reasoning which observe all Reasoning as premised in "limit" as a form of directed movement which gives foundation to various degrees and manners of phyiscal and abstract being which are connected through "The All" as simply everything.



9 Prime Directives of Reason



1) All Meaning Exists As Both Positive and Negative Values and is Inherently Neutral as Directed movement.

All meaning is subject to the context in which it exists; hence the relation of both context and the context of that context exists as meaning itself. This statement is universal and hence has no context except as itself, hence is intradimensionally directed; therefore the prior statement is negated while existing as true if and only if it continually expands, hence is extra dimensionally directed. From this statement all meaning maintains simultaneously positive and negative values, as both existing and lacking in existence; contradiction as a deficiency in reasoning is a statement of incompletion, hence relation, and does not exist on its own terms. Structure through reason is meaning with philosophy existing as the means of reasoning with knowledge as order through structure.

- Positivity as Directional
- The difficulty of Language in philosophy.
- List of philosophical schools, religions, sciences.
- Meaning through the all.
- All being as directed movement.


2) All Meaning Necessitates a Triadic Point, Linear and Circular Form and Function.

There can be no universal philosophy which explains everything as it would not only have to progress ad-fininitum, necessitating a permanent incompleteness, but would have to be completely unified and absent of any particular nature where a finite definition relates to another finite definition. However this in itself is a universal philosophy as it explains all philosophies and forthwith definition itself; therefore exists as a premise, equivalent to beginning point of origin, from which all philosophies are grounded while necessitating the premise as a universal philosophy in itself. All philosophy exists as premise, for further philosophies which exist as premise, from which reason is mediated through a point of origin.

There can be no universal premises which set the foundation for all philosophies; hence no universal philosophy, considering this observes philosophies exist through philosophies, as they would have to be continually broken down ad-infinitum while simultaneously manifesting further premises, and thereby philosophies, ad-infinitum. All premises, and therefore philosophies, in themselves must in effect be viewed as extensions of a universal and hence universal in themselves through the universal from which they extend. This in effect observes not just an infinite number of premises under increasely progressive finite relations but all finite premises as being universals in themselves as both extensions of universals and through the respect they progress ad-infinitum. This progressive nature of the premise through linear relations in the Western context of reasoning and a self-maintained circular nature in the Eastern context of reasoning observes it as fundamentally a directive means where the premise is directed both away from and towards itself through the structure of reason.

- Simplicity as comsistency.
- Complexity as Multiplicity.
- Circularity, Linearism, and Point in Logic.
- Negative Dimensional Lines


3) All Axioms Are Directives as Means of Movement; Hence All Axioms are Limits Through Unity and Multiplicity where All Axioms Act as Points of Unity and Inversion, necessitating them as both Axiomatic and Non-Axiomatic.

The premise as the foundation for all reason in effect exists as a means where universality is intradimensional and finiteness is extradimensional; hence premises exist fundamentally as directives with the directive in itself being self-evident, as an axiom, considering direction in itself is the foundation of not just movement but any stability from which movement arises. Axioms act as premises in the respect they are directives with the directive observing a dual nature of movement and stability with synthesize as limits in themselves considering both movement and stability extend from and exist through limit. The premise as directive, through its axiomatic nature as directive itself necessitates the axiom is the limit of reason as a directive; hence gives origin to both premise and the philosophy which stems from the premise as axioms in themselves and therefore directive limits which give both structure and meaning to phenomena.

All axioms are in themselves limits, through their directive nature with these statements being directive(s). These limits are both composed of and composing further limits through the limit itself; hence the limit maintains a dual extradimensional progressive linear nature and an intradimensional self-maintain circular nature, with the axiom existing through the axiom. The axiom through the axiom, which is an axiom in itself, observes the axiom as both self-maintained unity as 1 and relating localities (parts/units) as 1 providing the limit of Unity and Multiplicity.

As both self-maintained unity and progressive unit(s) the axiom observes a dualistic nature where its inversion between the one and many is non-axiomatic as an absence of axiom; which is conducive qualitatively to nothingness and quantitative 0 being a foundation of inversion from which the axiom as nothing is in itself inversive of other axioms through a self negation. The axiom as unity negates itself through the axiom as unit and the axiom as unit negates itself through the axiom as unity, where one inverts to the other as a relativistic positive or negative to the other when viewed as units. Or they exist as simple approximation of the other from a fixed unity. The axioms as a point of inversion, in the respect that the existence of one axiom is the non-existence of the other, observes the axiom as self-negating hence non-axiomatic at the same time in different respects. As inversive all axioms maintain a dual nature of randomness.

1d Point as Foundation of Unity
0d Point as Foundation of Multiplicity

******* extend

- Measurement as Projection of the Self
- Measurement as Maintainance of the Self
- Measurement as Origin of Self
- Science as Unscientific and Probabalistic
- Subjectivity and Objectivity (Subjectivity as chaos and Objectivity as order)
- Subjectivity as individualistic and Objectivity as group agreement.
- One becomes.what they reflect on and relate to.






- Measurement as Origin of Self

4) All Axioms are Infinite and Finite; Hence are both Quality and Quantity

This nature of the axiom as being premised in the “limit” through its directive capacity as both circular and linear necessitates a continuity in this “directive capacity” considering a self maintained circularity and linear progressiveness exists if and only it is infinite; hence limit exists through no-limit where the self-negation of no-limit, through its own absences of form and function, results in the limit. The limit continues a progressive movement through the negation of origin (as a limit in itself) while maintains itself through the absence of limit being the negative boundary which gives form to limit.


-Infinity as Limit of reason.
-Empirical Phenomena as Infinite through Line as Foundation.

The axiom, exists through limit and no-limit, observing a triadic nature in itself while simultaneously observing the origins of subjectivity and objectivity (under the premised of self-evidence which defines the axiom as “axiom”) as both existing from and through “limit”. This nature of limit, and its corresponding foundation within the axiom as the axiom through the axiom, observes an inherent directive capacity through the intradimensional and extradimensional nature of definition which necessitates in turn a third nature of limit, and hence the axiom, as interdimensional, where limit exists as a means to both further limit as itself through itself; furthermore the axiom exists as means therefore meaning.

- Quantity and Quality Existing through eachother.
-Wisdom as Having Sexual Nature due to Emphasis on Dualisms / destruction of sex is destruction of reason.
- The Qualitative and Quantiative Nature of Who,What,When,Where,How,Why.
- Triadic Nature of Human Constitution and Socializing.
- Male/Female dualism as mirroring of active and passive
- list of duals.
- 1,2,3 as Foundation of all number with monad, what and triad as Foundation for reason.
- Metaphors as qualitative equations.
- Emotion as Directive of Reason and Vice Versa. Emotion as root of movement "emote".
- All paradox as dualism and philosophy as meaningful through paradox with paradox solvable though triad.

**** extend






5) All Axioms are Neutral Definition as Limit and No-Limit Through Synthesis

This interdimensional nature of the axiom, through limit, gives a premise of neutrality from which intradimensional circular direction and extradimensional linear direction are synthesized through eachother and as existing in themselves. This intradimensional nature of definition, through circularity, observes an inherent self-maintained structure where extra dimensionality observes a progressive movement, with this movement and no-movement in effect providing the foundation of the axiom being definition through direction with the act of definition itself stemming from limit as limit. Definition, as axiomatic, is meaning and occurs through reasoning as a directive form and function.

- All Physical and Abstract Reality Stemming From Limit
- Virtues of Ruthlessness and Mercy
- Matter/Spirit Paradox and Solution


6) All Axioms are Causal and Random in Nature Through Mirroring Constants

Intradimensionality in effect, as structural maintenance, observes an inherent reflective capacity as infinite repetition of limits as a unified limit in itself setting the standard for the observation of causality as the observation of structure with any negation to this “causality as structure” giving further premised to randomness as approximation. Hence all axioms exist as one through extensions of the one and maintain this extensional nature through infinite structure under a self-reflective nature of cause through cause as effect with any perceived multiplicity in turn being an observation of randomness as negation in unity. This unified nature of the axiom observes it as positive and existing with the negative being an approximation of this unity, with the positive nature as existing occurring through a self- mirroring process of continual repetition as One.

Reason, through the axiom, in effect exists as 1 self-mirroring infinite moment from which all further reason, through the axioms, extends from as approximates of this 1 reason which exists qualitatively as a 1 dimensional point and the point as the quantitative foundation for one. This approximation between points, as a point, in effect is the axiom as a point in itself that exists approximately through other axioms under a negative dimensional linear limits that observe a connection between the axiom as one. All axioms as points of reason, are reason in and of themselves through the one axiom which is observed approximately through multiplicity.

Mirroring Constants are the foundation of Relativity while existing through its Synthesis with Relativistic Change.

- Dualism of Addition and Subtraction stemming from point space.
- Dualism of Multiplication and Division.
- Mirror Function in both Math and Logic
- Similarity as Unity
- Chaos as Constant Variable
- Density Paradox.
- Paradox of Point Division.
- Solution to Munchassen Trilemma


7) All Axioms are Actual and Potential Localizations Through Relative Change

Extradimensionality in effect, as progressive movement, observes an inherent relational capacity as parts existing through parts which both are composed of parts and compose further parts as finite localized phenomena where the actual localized part acts as a means of parts and any potential locality is a negative limit to localization as non-localization. This relational aspect to the localized nature of parts observes an inherent element extradimensional projection, premised through linearism as a spatial limit, where a part must continual project pasts its own origins to further parts under a simultaneously process of multiplication and division as individuation in which the part exist as a ratio of another through its linear progressive nature embodied under time as a temporal entity in itself.

Reason, through the axiom, in effect exists as relative units with these units being composed of further units with the unit itself observing movement as relation through multiplicity of parts as a 1 dimensional line and the line as the quantitative approximation of one as unity being one as unit relation. This continual relation of lines, as a line, in effect is the axiom as a line in itself which exists potentially through other axioms as potential axioms. The dual nature of actual and potential axioms as linear relations observes the axiom as a localization of limit. All axioms as lines of reason, are the continual progression of reason through the continual progression of axioms which is observe continually as a localization of unity being continual direction.

Relativity is an Inversion of Mirroring Constants while existing through its Synthesis with these Mirroring Constants

- Folding Function in Both Math and Logic.
- Time As Directed Movement
- Materialism as Probablistic.
- Line as triadic (line, angle, frequency as one)
- Active as Directed and Passive as Non Directed.
- Contraction and Expansion.
- n approaching infinity approaches 0.

8) All Axioms are Spatial and All Space is Axiomatic

The axiom in turn is:

a) Both limit and no-limit and extends from limit through limit as limit with limit providing the means of definition, hence order and being, as limit itself. The limit is the foundation of unity and multiplicity and through the axiom. The axiom is directive as means.

- Foundation of Psychology Stem From Synthesis, Creativity as Breaking apart and Putting Back together.


b) Causal as a means of self-reflective structure from which all structure extends from and through as structure itself, with structure itself being “causal” and existing through randomness as the limit of this structure. The axiom exists as the extension of 1 intradimensional point through which everything exists as 1 infinite moment which is approximately observed through multiple axioms which are points in themselves. All axioms are points from which structure begins and ends as an axiom (or point) in itself. The axiom is directive as self-maintaining through a self-mirroring process that exists infinitely as 1.

- Foundation of Psychology Stem From Mirroring Process
- Religious and Secular Rituals as Unifying and Forming Perspective.
- Absence of Ego rooted in Similarity as Cause.
- Ideas as structuring of material world.

c) Acausal as a means of continual relation of parts which exist through a process of inversion of unity into multiplicity with this multiplicity in turn approximating “unity” through the “unit” as localized relations which exist through non-localized movement (no-movement). The axiom exists as a 1 dimensional line of continually relating axioms which in turn both compose and are composed of further axioms as linear relations, with the localization of the relations through the line as an axiom in effect observe all axioms as points of inversion in one respect an in a seperate respect existing through potential non-localized axioms as the negative limit through which the axiom exists. The axiom is directive as progressive through a process of individuation (muliplicaiton/division) that continues ad-infinitum.

- Technology as Manipulation of Time.
- Social Media as Economy of Eyesight.
- Reciprocal Nature Of Technology.
- Why Time Speeds up as One gets older due to Increase in Memory.
- Branch Function Found In Nature.
- Natural Law as a Foundation of Reason, technology and morality
- Inference and Implication as Directional and Probablistic
- Ego as Appetite


d) The axiom in turn exists as having a triadic nature of 1 in 3 and 3 in 1 and is “directive” in nature through its nature as limit. All axioms as directive in turn observe a premise in space through the line, point and circle through which they exist in both form and function. This quantitative nature of 1 in 3 and 3 in 1 observes a qualitative nature of direction with both quantity and quality acting as limits in themselves that alternate through eachother. The axiom as the foundation of definition, through limit, exists as an infinitely expanding and contracting circle from which all definition, through the process of reason, existing as both founded upon and existing through space. Reason, as directive, is premised in space with the axiom extending from and through space as space. Space is being, as it gives form and function through the limit, with all axioms being composed of space and composing space as space itself through the “limit”. This is a simultaneously linear and circular axiom.

- Architecture of Idea.
- Geometry as Foundation for Morality.
- Golden Rule as Stemming From Geometry
- Relativity and Constant Truth exist through Golden Rule as One Cycle Extending through Many Cycles.
- Practical Applications
- Emotions/Sensation as Geometric (example of anger as directive and depression as passive).
- Perception Occurs through Limit
- Abductivity, Deductivity and Inductivity as Directional.
- Property Rights as Stewardship, Akin to Directing Phenomenon Through Time.
- Geometry as Foundation of Language and Cave Man Metaphor
- The Problem Of Proof
- Intelligence as Linear, Originality as Point, Power as Circular.
- Principle Mathematics, Type Theory, Linear Regression Analysis, Boolean Algebra, Hotel's
Incompleteness Theorems and Lambda calculus as directive qualities in math.
- Geometric Nature of Staff as Symbol for Wisdom in cultures.

9) These Directives are Laws By Means of their Limits; Hence are Universal Foundations of "The All" and "I Am"[/b]


These directives observe directives, as limits in themselves through their directive nature and maintain this directive nature as both intradimensional as circulating through themselves through a reflective symmetry which is causal, and extradimensional as projecting past themselves through a relativistic multiplicity that is individuative as an approximation of these causal laws. In these respects these directives as laws continually maintain themselves through their own circular definition while continually projecting towards further definition by observing the axiom, as dual subjective and objective truth, as interdimensional where all definition begins and ends through an infinitely expanding and contracting circle as the foundation of rational form. These 13 directives are axiomatic are both self-maintained and open for further definition.

- The All as a Rational Directive For Philosophy and Self Sustained Law.

- Proof as unprovable and symmetry as Foundation of proof.

-All is Mind (Matter as lower degree of Mind due to Common Foundations of Limit / All Mind as a Higher degree of Matter due to Common Foundations of Limit)

- Laws as framework of change as change.
- Ethics and Morality as Means of Being, directed Movement.
- Vice as Directed Towards Virtue, Vice as Absence of Direction
- Moderation as Growth / Problem of Extremes Is Problem Of Unity
- Christ / Messiah Avatar as Synthesis
- Religion, Philosophy and Science Founded in Reflective Process
- Habit founded In Frequency, leading to emotion as Frequency (high frequency as connective and low frequency as seperative).
- Memory as Frequency and Repitition of Events.
- Law of Necessity
- Belief as Measurement
- Reason as moral Law.
- King Prisoner Paradox
- Old Young Woman Paradox.
- Man as Measured Made in Image of Divine Measurer.
- Reason and Art as Encapsulation of Randomness
- 24 definitions
- Fallacy of Fallacies.
- injustice as imbalance of Values.
- Triadic Nature of One World Religion.
Post Reply