Positive, Negative and Neutral as Foundation of Definition

[Eodnhoj7]

1) What is positive exists.

2) What is negative is a deficiency within existence and not a thing in itself.

3) A positive which cannot be observe without a negative, observes the limits of the positive as having an existence through grades as it maintains a deficiency. This in turn observe a positive neutrality as "both positive and negative"; hence neutrality is observed gradation being a thing in itself hence positive.

4) A negative which cannot be observed without a positive, observes the positive as having an either/or condition in which the positive exists either as one thing or another as a thing in itself. This in turn observes a negative neutrality as "either positive or negative" (existing fully or in grades).

[Impenitent]

overall, donuts may be neutral, yet the existence of donut holes as a negative is paramount

-Imp

[Eodnhoj7]

overall, donuts may be neutral, yet the existence of donut holes as a negative is paramount

-Imp

Or is the hole a positive and the donut a negative? Does the donut exist because of the hole, or the hole because of the donut?

[Erk]

I think the donut and its hole exist because of the police.

[Impenitent]

I think the donut and its hole exist because of the police.

Sting would disagree

-Imp