Page 1 of 1

Positive, Negative and Neutral as Foundation of Definition

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 5:49 pm
by Eodnhoj7
1) What is positive exists.

2) What is negative is a deficiency within existence and not a thing in itself.

3) A positive which cannot be observe without a negative, observes the limits of the positive as having an existence through grades as it maintains a deficiency. This in turn observe a positive neutrality as "both positive and negative"; hence neutrality is observed gradation being a thing in itself hence positive.

4) A negative which cannot be observed without a positive, observes the positive as having an either/or condition in which the positive exists either as one thing or another as a thing in itself. This in turn observes a negative neutrality as "either positive or negative" (existing fully or in grades).

Re: Positive, Negative and Neutral as Foundation of Definition

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 6:58 pm
by Impenitent
overall, donuts may be neutral, yet the existence of donut holes as a negative is paramount

-Imp

Re: Positive, Negative and Neutral as Foundation of Definition

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:05 pm
by Eodnhoj7
Impenitent wrote: Sat Jun 23, 2018 6:58 pm overall, donuts may be neutral, yet the existence of donut holes as a negative is paramount

-Imp
Or is the hole a positive and the donut a negative? Does the donut exist because of the hole, or the hole because of the donut?

Re: Positive, Negative and Neutral as Foundation of Definition

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:21 pm
by Erk
I think the donut and its hole exist because of the police.

Re: Positive, Negative and Neutral as Foundation of Definition

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:07 am
by Impenitent
Erk wrote: Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:21 pm I think the donut and its hole exist because of the police.
Sting would disagree

-Imp