Well no, I mean I don't understand you 99% of the time, but that actually wasn't my main point in this discussion; My main point is just because someone says they don't understand what you just said, doesn't mean they're making a fallacious argument against what you're saying. In fact, if you took a second to think about it, that necessarily can't be a fallacious argument, in almost any situation.
Oh, so you don't understand 'my argument'? And do you know what I'm going to have to say about that?so whatever argument he presents against what he does not understand...is clearly not-understandable.
Claiming unknowing does not equate to the argument being either right or wrong, as one does not know; hence to argue against it would equivobly be saying "You are wrong because I don't understand you". Through a continual negation in the symphony of order, you claim meaning is relevant to you as an authority, and that the nature of "I do know" or "I do not know" does not mean a statement is either right or wrong but rather means "I do know" or blah blah blah, this logic is that which extends itself through my chunky, sweat-covered man-boobies, before they crash down onto my key-board whenever I get a notification from someone who dares to question either my intellect, or the obvious, made-up fabrications I have about my life, like having slept with sexy young lifeguards, being told I could have been a particle theorist by several different psychologists, having the hands of a surgeon and a perfect understanding of deer anatomy, or possessing a beyond genius-level 160 IQ
Commence the 'tisms.'
Well, yes, talking to someone like you is a frustrating ordeal, but it's more like dealing with a dementia patient, and less in the 'no woman has ever actually put her hands down my pants,' kind of way.He is just frustrated as usual.