Re: Non-Truth and Non-finality
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:03 am
It seems to me that you see a problem where there isn't any. Why search for a memory of the given when the given is (there)?Montgomery77 wrote:Breath wrote:You signal that we are in a word game when you say you are pursuing an inquiry. Before you can meaningfully pursue any inquiry, you must ground the act of inquiry itself.
What is an inquiry? what is a question?
What is a question? is first and foremost a statement, simply because what? is a question.
The alternate meaning is an absurd one.
What is a question? is questioning questioning. There is no foundation for that act, because it rests on an infinite regress.
Amen, I tell you, the beginning (ENDINGBEGINNOW) of thought would be to open this regress, not as a "going back", or any "infinity" but to the opening of Openess itself.
In other words, that which opens questioning and indifference, progress and regress, finitude and infinity, etc
The ENDINGBEGINNOW of philosophy is to restore the memory of that free and commanding signified, to discover Urwörter [originary words] in the language of the world by learning to by-pass the limiting logic of signification.