the practical definition of knowledge

Known unknowns and unknown unknowns!

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

popeye1945 wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 11:59 pm Experience is knowledge.
Then how are there differences in wording?
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by popeye1945 »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 12:25 am
popeye1945 wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 11:59 pm Experience is knowledge.
Then how are there differences in wording?
One can experience without language, it is perception, not communication.
Advocate
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by Advocate »

[quote=popeye1945 post_id=572244 time=1652327491 user_id=21999]
[quote=Eodnhoj7 post_id=572200 time=1652311558 user_id=14533]
[quote=popeye1945 post_id=571556 time=1652050774 user_id=21999]
Experience is knowledge.
[/quote]

Then how are there differences in wording?
[/quote]

One can experience without language, it is perception, not communication.
[/quote]

Knowledge is justified belief that an idea is true or useful. Experience is the current state of attention of a mind. These are not interchangable. Every experience gives you information, not belief, and even information that effects your beliefs doesn't necessarily change them. Experience is not belief of any kind, justified or otherwise.
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by popeye1945 »

[/quote]One can experience without language, it is perception, not communication.
[/quote]

Knowledge is justified belief that an idea is true or useful. Experience is the current state of attention of a mind. These are not interchangable. Every experience gives you information, not belief, and even information that effects your beliefs doesn't necessarily change them. Experience is not belief of any kind, justified or otherwise.
[/quote]

Perception is experienced and taken as an occurrence to be true until there is reason to question that truth. While it is true that perception and the judgement thereof is not infallible, it is the best we have and fundamental to our ability to move through the world with any confidence. Experience is belief and experience is knowledge, as stated, not infallible.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

popeye1945 wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 4:51 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 12:25 am
popeye1945 wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 11:59 pm Experience is knowledge.
Then how are there differences in wording?
One can experience without language, it is perception, not communication.
Language is a symbol, a symbol points to a phenomenon. All phenomena point to further phenomena thus share the same nature as a symbol. Creation is its own language and the differences in symbols, ie language, show a contradiction in creation.
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by popeye1945 »

Then how are there differences in wording?
[/quote]

One can experience without language, it is perception, not communication.
[/quote]

Language is a symbol, a symbol points to a phenomenon. All phenomena point to further phenomena thus share the same nature as a symbol. Creation is its own language and the differences in symbols, ie language, show a contradiction in creation.
[/quote]

Eodnhoj7,

If all phenomena pointed to all other phenomena one would not need language to communicate, it is a non-sense phrase you've concocted. Experience is immediate knowledge, language is only needed to communicate the knowledge of experience to others.
trokanmariel
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:35 am

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by trokanmariel »

The practical definition of knowledge:

An alliance, between words as visual meaning (as being able to self-utilise to stop sex nationalism's mockery of magic nationalism's secret of sociology) and the morality reality's empathy to ignorance relative to when stepping on insects, can mean the activation, of the chaos of socialism's distribution across many different themes of existence (Lia Haddock's edit, from Limetown) being a computational puzzle.

What do I mean, by computational puzzle?
It means, essentially, that the projection of meta art (no literal meaning) to the morality of staying anchored to daylight as mediator, and left-wing transcendence, the conflation politics between writing is from sex/visual word power, and gravitation to body glamour can lose, to the universal computation's desire to know the symmetry.

To know the symmetry:
This is about beyond the deity plug, to the origin of existence, and it is about beyond any achilles heel dichotomy of sociology external being a means for Gods to harm the self-orientation device. Moreover, this is a system in which the hidden story, supported by God's knows what, of physics playing catch up with the storytelling sex arc using daylight as quantity (an example being house architecture pattern in the United States, being a visual word power dimension from perhaps the quantity realm) would presumably never have the democratic right to be identified.

Which brings me onto the next idea:

The anchoring, to daylight as mediator (the bias of mediator label coming from daylight as literal overseer force), and the rest of the aforementioned creates an irony of no democracy; the no democracy construct - aided by my silence as non-ironic bullet proof system - can thus aid the desire to know the symmetry mission, containing all kinds of themes, like feeding animals the right way, typing on the keyboard the right way, breathing the right way, having sex the right way, etc etc.


Astronomy - what is its ulterior?

It's a theme possession by humanity, which means a safe display of different co-ordinations.

Humanity = theme
display = co-ordinations

Assuming the pendulum identity, of this difference as symmetry, can this help me stabilize my silence as bullet proof system, juxtaposed with my mission to help Edward Norton's Derek from his computation by Samantha Worzeil as parallel to Robert heath being a Peek-A-Boo subject of aforementioned sociology external to harm myself, a computation device.

To close;

Physics having to grab, onto its antithesis, as a deconstruction through science theme as no entertainment for the meta rule - can planets and stars be a parallel of morality context minus the theme matter as universal access?

For Gerald Olin
popeye1945
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:12 am

Re: the practical definition of knowledge

Post by popeye1945 »

Truth to the individual is experience whether it agrees with physical reality or not, but one thing is assured, experience is always true to the biology that has the experience. The truth of one experience might well be different from different biologies, an ill or damaged biology. If the biology is impaired it cannot itself properly check its own credibility with the same biology that made the delusional error about the state of the physical world. This is where group agreement is a little more assuring but it too is not infallible. Truth or falsehood is always true to the individual biology.
Post Reply