An argument for the existence of God

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:Ok...glad all the dialogue has ceased re infinity...

Can anyone take their veil from their eyes and actually state that the following locations on our dear planet are nothing more than coincidences of reality?

UK to scale - (including the Aisle of Man)
Image

South America to scale - a rather large Bra is ill. Chile a thin backbone. Natal (dict of or relating to childbirth) the nipple
Image

SINAI - the location where man was instructed commandments to abide by from an ALL knowing entity..God - an AI in a binary universe?
Sin AI.
Image




http://www.androcies.com
I saw a camel in the clouds today.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by attofishpi »

chaz wyman wrote:I saw a camel in the clouds today.
Did it shit in both eyes?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:I saw a camel in the clouds today.
Did it shit in both eyes?
I have no idea what you are on about.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by attofishpi »

chaz wyman wrote:I have no idea what you are on about.
I'm suggesting you are blind.
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:I have no idea what you are on about.
I'm suggesting you are blind.
You are trying to suggest that I am blind with the phrase "did it shit in both eyes?"

You need to say "Did in shit in your eyes?"

Now I have understood your garbled English - here is my response:

No, it did not shit in my eyes; a dog just like you was eating the shit as soon as it come out of its arse.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by attofishpi »

I would appreciate any comments...yea or nay from Theists in relation to the images I have posted...evidence of God? :)
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:I would appreciate any comments...yea or nay from Theists in relation to the images I have posted...evidence of God? :)
The only thing I can hear is the gentle rolling across the dry sand of a tumble weed, drifting across the desolate landscape.

Image
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by attofishpi »

chaz wyman wrote:The only thing I can hear is the gentle rolling across the dry sand of a tumble weed, drifting across the desolate landscape.

Image
...gold...

Active lot these 'Theists'
...perhaps a riddle to solve while we wait?

i walked along till i found it
i picked it up to look for it
i found i couldnt find it
so i put it down and walked away with it

What is it?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:The only thing I can hear is the gentle rolling across the dry sand of a tumble weed, drifting across the desolate landscape.

Image
...gold...

Active lot these 'Theists'
...perhaps a riddle to solve while we wait?

i walked along till i found it
i picked it up to look for it
i found i couldnt find it
so i put it down and walked away with it

What is it?
I'll have to get back to you on that!
Q: Does the meaning if "it" change?


Try this:
I can run but not walk. I can breath but never speak. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by attofishpi »

chaz wyman wrote:I'll have to get back to you on that!
Q: Does the meaning if "it" change?
No. Its a material object.
chaz wyman wrote:Try this:
I can run but not walk. I can breath but never speak. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
I can run but not walk. (a tap, water, car...)
I can breath but never speak. (animals, red wine, a mute...)
Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. (a movie...)
What am I?

The though follows close behind was the giveaway...a nose!
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:I'll have to get back to you on that!
Q: Does the meaning if "it" change?
No. Its a material object.
chaz wyman wrote:Try this:
I can run but not walk. I can breath but never speak. Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. What am I?
I can run but not walk. (a tap, water, car...)
I can breath but never speak. (animals, red wine, a mute...)
Wherever I go, thought follows close behind. (a movie...)
What am I?

The though follows close behind was the giveaway...a nose!
Correct!
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by attofishpi »

chaz wyman wrote:I'll have to get back to you on that!
Q: Does the meaning if "it" change?
No. Its a material object.
I'll give you a clue...it's very small. I will give you one more clue only.
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:I'll have to get back to you on that!
Q: Does the meaning if "it" change?
No. Its a material object.
I'll give you a clue...it's very small. I will give you one more clue only.
I've got a sinking feeling that this is not going to work out.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by attofishpi »

chaz wyman wrote:
attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:I'll have to get back to you on that!
Q: Does the meaning if "it" change?
No. Its a material object.
I'll give you a clue...it's very small. I will give you one more clue only.
I've got a sinking feeling that this is not going to work out.
Why? I assure you the logic is sound...let me know if you want the final clue.

i walked along till i found it
i picked it up to look for it
i found i couldnt find it
i put it down and walked away with it

What is it?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: An argument for the existence of God

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:
attofishpi wrote:
I've got a sinking feeling that this is not going to work out.
Why? I assure you the logic is sound...let me know if you want the final clue.

i walked along till i found it
i picked it up to look for it
i found i couldnt find it
i put it down and walked away with it

What is it?
I think you'd better give me the clue.
Please don't take it too personally if, when I know the answer, I find fault with your riddle.
Post Reply