The Falsity Paradox

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

The Falsity Paradox

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Falsity is an absence of truth thus an absence. As an absence it is a negative limit, ie defining something by that which it is not (the limits of a thing). As a negative limit it is a limit thus falsity inherently exists and as existing has a truth value.
Walker
Posts: 14280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Falsity Paradox

Post by Walker »

All believable lies contain an element of truth.
CHNOPS
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:11 am

Re: The Falsity Paradox

Post by CHNOPS »

If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".

You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The Falsity Paradox

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

CHNOPS wrote: Sat Oct 08, 2022 2:18 am If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".

You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
CHNOPS
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:11 am

Re: The Falsity Paradox

Post by CHNOPS »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:52 pm
CHNOPS wrote: Sat Oct 08, 2022 2:18 am If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".

You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.

There are only True statements.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The Falsity Paradox

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

CHNOPS wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 3:44 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:52 pm
CHNOPS wrote: Sat Oct 08, 2022 2:18 am If you only have "A" and "B", then you can define "A" as "no-B".

You are always saying True statements. There is no contradiction in falsity, because is not the absence of truth.
Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.

There are only True statements.
Falsity is relativity as relativity is partial truths.
CHNOPS
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:11 am

Re: The Falsity Paradox

Post by CHNOPS »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:46 pm
CHNOPS wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 3:44 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:52 pm

Yet it is true as being false thus contains a truth value.
That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.

There are only True statements.
Falsity is relativity as relativity is partial truths.
Call it "falsity" if you want, but is just a right knowledge about something.

Are right knowledge relatives? Yes.

And I dont get then what you are saying.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: The Falsity Paradox

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

CHNOPS wrote: Tue Oct 25, 2022 12:00 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:46 pm
CHNOPS wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 3:44 pm

That if you define "false" as "no-true". But I say that that is no what it really is.

There are only True statements.
Falsity is relativity as relativity is partial truths.
Call it "falsity" if you want, but is just a right knowledge about something.

Are right knowledge relatives? Yes.

And I dont get then what you are saying.
All falsities contain an element of truth in the respect they require something that exists to be twisted, in another respect all falsities are true as falsities, and in a third respect all partial truths are false under different contexts and this is required by the fact that a partial truth is only true under a given context (in simpler terms: change the context and the truth value changes).
Post Reply