The Paradox of Rationalization

[Eodnhoj7]

Everything is beyond conception as everything is formless, this formlessness is because there is nothing beyond everything that allows for contrast necessary for form.

In regards to rationalizing everything through equations, everything cannot equate to anything as the equation points to a dyad, the thing and the thing that the thing is equal too. Because equality is dyadic 'everything' cannot equate to anything at all because said equation would require 'everything' and 'something else beside everything'. This 'something else beside everything' would result in everything not being everything.

'Everything' can have no rational equation because the equation would require 'everything' to be a part thus necessitating it as a part having parts beyond it (in which case everything is not everything).

[Walker]

Formless refers to the ineffable essence of anything being a single identifying characteristic.

[Eodnhoj7]

Formless refers to the ineffable essence of anything being a single identifying characteristic.

Paradoxically yes...formlessness is one (as there is no comparison for form) yet as only one is without comparison, necessary for form, thus is zero.

[Walker]

I'd say, thus is sui generis.