The Reflection Paradox

[Age]

They are connected through the observer and only that which is observed exists.

So, ALL the 'things' that are BEYOND human being observation do NOT exist, that is; according to 'your' so-called "logic" here right "eodnhoj7"?

Form is consciousness as the nature of self-reflection, found in higher consciousness, is a loop form. This looping is universal, as repetition is universal, thus all is aware if form is consciousness.

That is a big 'IF'.

See, to me, 'form' IS 'form' and NOT 'consciousness', because 'consciousness' IS 'consciousness' and NOT 'form', because 'form' IS 'form'.

HOWEVER, what the words 'consciousness' AND 'form' MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY, is a whole other matter.

1. I never said "human being observation", I said "observer". If all is conscious, in the respect interaction is consciousness and all things have a degree of interaction, then the "observer" is not limited to human beings.

2. Form imprints itself on the consciousness and consciousness on the form thus a false dichotomy of consciousness and form occurs if one differentiates them.

If one 'what' exactly differentiates them?

[Eodnhoj7]

So, ALL the 'things' that are BEYOND human being observation do NOT exist, that is; according to 'your' so-called "logic" here right "eodnhoj7"?



That is a big 'IF'.

See, to me, 'form' IS 'form' and NOT 'consciousness', because 'consciousness' IS 'consciousness' and NOT 'form', because 'form' IS 'form'.

HOWEVER, what the words 'consciousness' AND 'form' MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY, is a whole other matter.

1. I never said "human being observation", I said "observer". If all is conscious, in the respect interaction is consciousness and all things have a degree of interaction, then the "observer" is not limited to human beings.

2. Form imprints itself on the consciousness and consciousness on the form thus a false dichotomy of consciousness and form occurs if one differentiates them.

If one 'what' exactly differentiates them?

Observer.

[Age]

1. I never said "human being observation", I said "observer". If all is conscious, in the respect interaction is consciousness and all things have a degree of interaction, then the "observer" is not limited to human beings.

2. Form imprints itself on the consciousness and consciousness on the form thus a false dichotomy of consciousness and form occurs if one differentiates them.

If one 'what' exactly differentiates them?

Observer.

So, if the Observer does NOT differentiate 'them', then there is NO false dichotomy correct?

[Eodnhoj7]

If one 'what' exactly differentiates them?

Observer.

So, if the Observer does NOT differentiate 'them', then there is NO false dichotomy correct?

Relative observation is the act of differentiation. Absolute observation is an absence of differentiation.

[Age]

Observer.

So, if the Observer does NOT differentiate 'them', then there is NO false dichotomy correct?

Relative observation is the act of differentiation. Absolute observation is an absence of differentiation.

If you say and believe so.