Why did you choose 0 instead of 1?Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:33 pmI already did write itbahman wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:00 pmYou cannot possibly write a code that can decide when options are equally liked. You cannot resolve the halting problem when a chain of causality forks.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:47 pm Right, which is exactly why it's begging the question. There's nothing I could show you which could possibly make you think determinism might be compatible with it, because whatever I show you, you've already decided you're being shown it by a being that's incompatible with determinsm. You've put yourself into a situation where you can't even recognize anything to the contrary as anything other than self-contradictory, even if it isn't.
It feels like another conversation I had with someone recently who was insisting that, if you flip a coin 3 times in a row and they're all heads, the 4th flip is more likely to be tails. I was trying to tell him, no no no, if it's a fair coin, the 4th flip is still 50/50, and he had defined the scenario in such a way in his mind that me saying that was literally inherently contradictory to him. He couldn't see past his own nose.
Free will and determinism
Re: Free will and determinism
Re: Free will and determinism
I didn't lose the plot. I am right on the spot.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 9:01 pmI think you've lost the plot here.bahman wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:02 pmBy proper I mean the road that takes you to your destination. Another road does not. You cannot know which road is the proper one yet you have to decide. Can't you decide?Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:52 pm
What do you mean "proper"? If they are not exactly the same then you have something different upon which you make your choice.
If they appear identical then the simple fact that at time=x you are looking at one rather then the other means they are different in that way.
And are not really paying attention to the thread
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Free will and determinism
It doesn't matter, that's beside the point.
You've defined all the words surrounding your world view such that you can't come to any conclusion other than your world view - you've defined yourself into a corner, and you're trying to tell us to join you in your prison in the corner.
No amount of definitions of words can prove that determinism is or isn't true in this universe. Words aren't the deciding factor. Their definitions aren't the deciding factor. The universe could be deterministic, or it could not be, but semantic arguments don't decide that.
-
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Free will and determinism
"The universe could be deterministic, or it could not be"
I stand by Harris, Sam and his claim that freewill is inconceivable in any possible universe.
https://youtu.be/iA6Qc8h8ulQ
I stand by Harris, Sam and his claim that freewill is inconceivable in any possible universe.
https://youtu.be/iA6Qc8h8ulQ
Re: Free will and determinism
So you have no reason for choosing 1 instead of 0?
I am afraid to say that that is you who are in the prison of your belief. I already mentioned that a decision is either biased or not. Can't we agree on this simple fact?Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:00 pm You've defined all the words surrounding your world view such that you can't come to any conclusion other than your world view - you've defined yourself into a corner, and you're trying to tell us to join you in your prison in the corner.
My argument is not just on words. It is based on internal evidence that we are aware of it.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:00 pm No amount of definitions of words can prove that determinism is or isn't true in this universe. Words aren't the deciding factor. Their definitions aren't the deciding factor. The universe could be deterministic, or it could not be, but semantic arguments don't decide that.
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Free will and determinism
Of course we can. But you have the burden of showing why that's relevant, why only unbiased decisions count as "free", and why a deterministic system couldn't produce those decisions.
Re: Free will and determinism
He is wrong: The universe could be deterministic and could be indeterministic. It is a matter of situation, if there is one option in any given situation then it is deterministic, otherwise, it is not.promethean75 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:25 pm "The universe could be deterministic, or it could not be"
I stand by Harris, Sam and his claim that freewill is inconceivable in any possible universe.
https://youtu.be/iA6Qc8h8ulQ
-
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Free will and determinism
I won't believe it. Sam is never wrong.
Re: Free will and determinism
Cool.
That is a matter of definition.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:56 pm But you have the burden of showing why that's relevant, why only unbiased decisions count as "free",
That is understandable given the definition of determinism. A deterministic system goes from one state of affairs to another one, let's call these two states X and Y. Y is uniquely determined given X. The problem arises when we are dealing with options. Let's say that there are two options that the system can evolve to, Y and Z, where Y and Z are equally liked. Considering the fact that Y and Z are equally liked, then the system cannot deterministically evolve to one of Y or Z. Therefore it halts. Why halts? Because Y or Z must be uniquely determined by X but there is no way that a determined system can choose one of them since there is no reason for that choice.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 4:56 pm and why a deterministic system couldn't produce those decisions.
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Free will and determinism
I'm sorry, but that doesn't make a lick of sensebahman wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:45 pm That is understandable given the definition of determinism. A deterministic system goes from one state of affairs to another one, let's call these two states X and Y. Y is uniquely determined given X. The problem arises when we are dealing with options. Let's say that there are two options that the system can evolve to, Y and Z, where Y and Z are equally liked. Considering the fact that Y and Z are equally liked, then the system cannot deterministically evolve to one of Y or Z. Therefore it halts. Why halts? Because Y or Z must be uniquely determined by X but there is no way that a determined system can choose one of them since there is no reason for that choice.
Re: Free will and determinism
Could we agree that there is a reason when a deterministic system evolves from X to Y?Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:53 pmI'm sorry, but that doesn't make a lick of sensebahman wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:45 pm That is understandable given the definition of determinism. A deterministic system goes from one state of affairs to another one, let's call these two states X and Y. Y is uniquely determined given X. The problem arises when we are dealing with options. Let's say that there are two options that the system can evolve to, Y and Z, where Y and Z are equally liked. Considering the fact that Y and Z are equally liked, then the system cannot deterministically evolve to one of Y or Z. Therefore it halts. Why halts? Because Y or Z must be uniquely determined by X but there is no way that a determined system can choose one of them since there is no reason for that choice.
Re: Free will and determinism
Exactly because of this, a deterministic system cannot evolve any further when the options are equally like since there is no reason to choose one option over another.
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Free will and determinism
Why do you think any situation in a deterministic system will produce options that are "equally likely"?
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Free will and determinism
Take Conway's game of Life. The code deterministically determines the next state from the previous state, based on rules. The rules are followed, and they determine the next state of the system precisely every time. There's no "options". Just rules about what happens next.